On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 10:30:01PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > /usr/share/pixmaps
> This is wrong.
I disagree. There are a significant number of applications have pixmaps
and aren't even partially related to X. (GGI based apps for example) I
think having both locat
Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think we should standardize around /usr/include/X11/{bitmap,pixmap}.
> I thought that include was a place for storing C header files. Yes I
> have looked at an xpm before, but even so, it is still an odd
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > bitmaps: /usr/X11R6/include/bitmaps
> This is wrong.
>
> > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/bitmaps
> This is correct.
>
> > pixmaps: /usr/X11R6/include/X11/pixmaps
> This is correct.
>
> > /usr/sha
On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 01:01:26PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I've just been looking at Contents-i386 to get an idea of where
> bitmaps and pixmaps are currently stored so that I can set up the new
> system.fvwm2rc file correctly, and I found a mess. The locations of
> public (as opposed to app
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bitmaps: /usr/X11R6/include/bitmaps
> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/bitmaps
> pixmaps: /usr/X11R6/include/X11/pixmaps
> /usr/share/pixmaps
I think either /usr/share/pixmaps or /usr/share/bitmaps would be best.
--
I consume, therefore I am
I've just been looking at Contents-i386 to get an idea of where
bitmaps and pixmaps are currently stored so that I can set up the new
system.fvwm2rc file correctly, and I found a mess. The locations of
public (as opposed to application-specific) bitmaps and pixmaps are
currently:
bitmaps: /usr/X1
6 matches
Mail list logo
