Thomas Koenig writes:
> [My subscription to debian-policy is on the way, but in the meantime,
> please CC: any replies to me. Thanks.]
>
> I just caught this on Christian's excellent weekly report, and I'd
> like to add my 0.01 Euro.
>
> My suggestion would be that daemons should be started up
[I still need CC:s. Thanks :-]
>i propose a slightly modified version :
>lets create a config file or so, where the sysadmin can say
>"new daemons should register in runlevels X Y Z".
That sounds excellent. I've always been a bit wary about the
"install and start everything at once" approach ta
On Thu 23 Oct 1997, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> My suggestion would be that daemons should be started up according to
> the runlevel the system currently is in. Interaction in postinst script
> should only be done when absolutely necessary, IMHO.
i don't like this idea. it is very usefull, for normal
On Thu 23 Oct 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
>
> Topic 13: Starting daemons in the postinst scripts
like my proposal to topic #12 :
if you want to query the admin, please recognize some special file or
variable "e.g. /etc/dpkg/fastconfig", do not start the daemon, and
add a li
Topic 13: Starting daemons in the postinst scripts
STATE: DISCUSSION
The following policy has been suggested:
If a package installs a `daemon' that is usually started via an
/etc/init.d/ script, the package should query the system
administrator after the installation (i
[My subscription to debian-policy is on the way, but in the meantime,
please CC: any replies to me. Thanks.]
I just caught this on Christian's excellent weekly report, and I'd
like to add my 0.01 Euro.
My suggestion would be that daemons should be started up according to
the runlevel the system
6 matches
Mail list logo
