Re: Vote results for the proposed policy guidelines

1998-09-01 Thread Jules Bean
On Mon, 31 Aug 1998, Shaleh wrote: > Um, out of a group of what 200 or 300 some odd developers, only *15* > voted. Is this good enough for decisions? That is roughly 5%. Yup. It's fine. Lots of people aren't on the policy list (meaning, that they don't care, presumably). I didn't vote (or ev

Re: Vote results for the proposed policy guidelines

1998-09-01 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Alex" == Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alex> And when was the announcement? It looks like I missed it... You want me to fsh out the message id's? The proposal was posted on -devel and -policy on August the 6th. Initial discussions were also crossposted. On

Re: Vote results for the proposed policy guidelines

1998-09-01 Thread Alex Yukhimets
> Um, out of a group of what 200 or 300 some odd developers, only *15* > voted. Is this good enough for decisions? That is roughly 5%. And when was the announcement? It looks like I missed it... Alex Y.

Re: Vote results for the proposed policy guidelines

1998-08-31 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Shaleh" == Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Shaleh> Um, out of a group of what 200 or 300 some odd developers, only *15* Shaleh> voted. Is this good enough for decisions? That is roughly 5%. I think so. Firstly, not everyone is actually subscribed to the policy list. Of the

Re: Vote results for the proposed policy guidelines

1998-08-31 Thread Shaleh
Um, out of a group of what 200 or 300 some odd developers, only *15* voted. Is this good enough for decisions? That is roughly 5%. Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Hi, > > The proposal recieved an unanimous approval, with 15 votes > being cast. T think that this pretty much does it. > >