Hi,
>>"Luis" == Luis Francisco Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Luis> Now, if you guarantee proposals will have that header I don't
Luis> have a problem.
Well, I think that was part of the guidelines. We shall try
and strive to ensure it is adhered to
.
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Let me get this straignt. You can't be bothered to read your
> own mail, you cant be bothered to check a web page, you cant be
> bothered to filter the -devel list looking for the ^Subject: .*PROPOSAL:
> header into a new list, you can't be bothered to setup some
Hi,
>>"Luis" == Luis Francisco Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Given the use of the BTS, any such list is redundant.
Luis> Yeah right. I just said that reading all the messages that get into my
Luis> mailbox is too much and the solution is to force me to regularly check a
Luis> web pag
On Wed, 2 Sep 1998, Luis Francisco Gonzalez wrote:
> > So why don't you bookmark the bug page on policy? Any proposal
> > shall show up as a wishlist bug, and formal amendments shall show up
> > as regular bugs. The bug reports shall be retitles to show the
> > current status.
> >
> >
> So why don't you bookmark the bug page on policy? Any proposal
> shall show up as a wishlist bug, and formal amendments shall show up
> as regular bugs. The bug reports shall be retitles to show the
> current status.
>
> Given the use of the BTS, any such list is redundant.
Yeah r
Hi,
>>"Luis" == Luis Francisco Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Luis> With the amount of traffic in almost all debian lists, I can
Luis> hardly keep up with all of it. I do want to know the issues
Luis> discussed but get burried in lots of email. Now having that
Luis> list would allow me t
> Personally, I don't think that this is necessary, since I feel that
> developers who care about policy should read the group, and those who
> don't should be content to 'toe the line'. However, if someone else were
> to propose a scheme like that above, I wouldn't vote against it.
With the amoun
Hi,
Since we are going to be using the BTS for keeping track of
policy proposals, one can just use a script to look at the current
state of policy.
bugsin () { lynx http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/pa/l$1.html }
manoj
--
Sam: What's the good word, Norm? Norm: Plop, plop, fizz, fi
On 01-Sep-98 Jules Bean wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 1998, Darren Benham wrote:
>
>> I'd say announcing it to the "general" developer public would be a courtesy
>> if
>> nothing else. There might be an issue that someone feels important enough
>> (or
>> important enough to his packages) that he'd want
On Tue, 1 Sep 1998, Darren Benham wrote:
> I'd say announcing it to the "general" developer public would be a courtesy if
> nothing else. There might be an issue that someone feels important enough (or
> important enough to his packages) that he'd want to participate but not, in
> general, be a p
I'd say announcing it to the "general" developer public would be a courtesy if
nothing else. There might be an issue that someone feels important enough (or
important enough to his packages) that he'd want to participate but not, in
general, be a part of ALL policy discussions.
On 01-Sep-98 Mano
11 matches
Mail list logo
