On Tue, 1 Sep 1998, Darren Benham wrote: > I'd say announcing it to the "general" developer public would be a courtesy if > nothing else. There might be an issue that someone feels important enough (or > important enough to his packages) that he'd want to participate but not, in > general, be a part of ALL policy discussions.
Well, an option which presents itself is the creation of a policy-announce group. The policy-announce group would be used to post formal proposals and CFVs, maybe (and results). Personally, I don't think that this is necessary, since I feel that developers who care about policy should read the group, and those who don't should be content to 'toe the line'. However, if someone else were to propose a scheme like that above, I wouldn't vote against it. Jules /----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\ | Jelibean aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 6 Evelyn Rd | | Jules aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Richmond, Surrey | | Julian Bean | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TW9 2TF *UK* | +----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+ | War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. | | When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. | \----------------------------------------------------------------------/
