Previously Brian White wrote:
> I realize that. Any idea when the patch I provide will actually be applied
> to the policy manual? It would be nice to get this underway.
After the woody release I suspect.
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL
> > Any idea when the patch I provided will actually be applied to the policy
> > manual? It would be nice to get this underway. Thanks!
>
> Policy is frozen.
I realize that. Any idea when the patch I provide will actually be applied
to the policy manual? It would be nice to get this underway
Previously Brian White wrote:
> Any idea when the patch I provided will actually be applied to the policy
> manual? It would be nice to get this underway. Thanks!
Policy is frozen.
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This
Any idea when the patch I provided will actually be applied to the policy
manual? It would be nice to get this underway. Thanks!
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
---
Hi Brian!
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Brian White wrote:
> There is new Debian policy regarding the use of "cgi-bin" in web servers.
> The basic issue is that many webmasters expect to have this directory
> available for their own use and not have it taken over by the system to be
> used by the various
Now that we're getting ready for a new release, I'd like to implement
this new policy in the new development stream. Here is the text I plan
to include in the necessary bug reports I'll submit.
I don't forsee any difficulties with the upgrade path. Please let me
know if you think I missed someth
>>"Brian" == Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The best path may be to get the http server packages to add in
>> the new script directory as an alias, and then put the change in
>> policy as a recommendation, and, later, when most packages have had a
>> chance to change, we can put in
> Brian> This this has now passed the first step of a policy change,
> Brian> I'm changing the bug title and severity. Sorry for the
> Brian> delay... I hadn't realized what I had to do.
>
> The one problem I see with this proposal is that it does not
> put into place any transition
>>"Brian" == Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> This this has now passed the first step of a policy change,
Brian> I'm changing the bug title and severity. Sorry for the
Brian> delay... I hadn't realized what I had to do.
The one problem I see with this proposal is that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 32263 [AMENDMENT 20/01/2000] Splitting cgi-bin
Bug#32263: [PROPOSAL] Splitting cgi-bin
Changed Bug title.
> severity normal
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
retitle 32263 [AMENDMENT 20/01/2000] Splitting cgi-bin
severity normal
--
This this has now passed the first step of a policy change, I'm changing
the bug title and severity. Sorry for the delay... I hadn't realized
what I had to do.
> -
> Most people setting up a web site expect /cgi-bin/
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 12:20:53AM -0500, Brian White wrote:
> Here's what I wrote up as a patch to "policy.sgml".
>
> ===
> --- policy.sgml.orig Fri Nov 3 00:02:17 2000
> +++ policy.sgml Fri Nov 3 00:18:45 2000
>
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 12:20:53AM -0500, Brian White wrote:
> --- policy.sgml.orig Fri Nov 3 00:02:17 2000
> +++ policy.sgml Fri Nov 3 00:18:45 2000
> @@ -2949,9 +2949,20 @@
>
> and can be referred to as
>
> - http://localhost/cgi-
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 09:16:02AM -0500, Brian White wrote:
> > -
> > Most people setting up a web site expect /cgi-bin/ to be available for
> > scripts on their site. Unfortunately, Debian uses this for those scripts
> > packages that get installed. These two need to be independant.
> >
>
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 09:16:02AM -0500, Brian White wrote:
> -
> Most people setting up a web site expect /cgi-bin/ to be available for
> scripts on their site. Unfortunately, Debian uses this for those scripts
> packages that get installed. These two need to be independant.
>
> As such, D
Now that there is some time to make changes before the next release,
can we look at this idea again. It's really a pretty simple idea
that would save some headaches for professional webmaster. Most
people have said they thought it was a good idea. It just needs to
go through the final steps of b
16 matches
Mail list logo
