Re: Problem with dpkg-architecture

1999-05-05 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, May 05, 1999 at 07:34:02AM -0600, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote: > > Guy Maor writes: > > GM> Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> 1) Make "-e" the default. > > GM> No way! -e is a horrible argument that makes makefiles break for > GM> mysterious reasons. (Note that dpkg-

Re: Problem with dpkg-architecture

1999-05-05 Thread Gordon Matzigkeit
> Guy Maor writes: GM> Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> 1) Make "-e" the default. GM> No way! -e is a horrible argument that makes makefiles break for GM> mysterious reasons. GM> You should just arrange for the overrides to be set on the GM> command line. I agree with

Re: Problem with dpkg-architecture

1999-05-05 Thread Guy Maor
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1) Make "-e" the default. No way! -e is a horrible argument that makes makefiles break for mysterious reasons. You should just arrange for the overrides to be set on the command line. Guy

Re: Problem with dpkg-architecture

1999-05-05 Thread Aaron Van Couwenberghe
On Tue, May 04, 1999 at 11:32:23PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > Hello, > > there is a small problem with dpkg-architecture nobody seems to have noticed > before. [snip] > 1.b) Specify "MAKEFLAGS=-e" in dpkg-buildpackage. Note: make documentation >

Problem with dpkg-architecture

1999-05-04 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
Hello, there is a small problem with dpkg-architecture nobody seems to have noticed before. "make" does by default override environment variables, unless the option "-e" is given. For this, dpkg-cross sets MAKEFLAGS="-e". In my proposal I assumed that "-e&qu