Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Well, part of the difficulty in classifying this material is
> that one has to make the judement call on whether the things being
> referred to are supposed to be standard API's that shall not be
> lightly changed, and thus viable policy items, or they
>>"Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wichert> Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I am also ambivalent about sections like 4.1 "Syntax of
>> control files". That section could be said to belong in policy, as
>> dictating the standard format of control files, and any ch
Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I am also ambivalent about sections like 4.1 "Syntax of
> control files". That section could be said to belong in policy, as
> dictating the standard format of control files, and any change may
> affect every package there is, on the other hand, this is merely
>
>>"Josip" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Josip> On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 02:57:30PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> 6.3. Details of unpack phase of installation or upgrade
>> 6.4. Details of configuration
>> 6.5. Details of removal and/or configuration purging
Josip> These secti
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 04:13:37PM -0400, Franklin Belew wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 02:57:30PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
>
> Can we add a section on shared objects that are merely plugins or components
> of a larger program?
> For example: xmms plugins, and mozilla xpcom objects
XFr
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 02:57:30PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> 6.3. Details of unpack phase of installation or upgrade
> 6.4. Details of configuration
> 6.5. Details of removal and/or configuration purging
These sections surely have some technical details that the Policy doesn't
need to conta
>>"Myth" == Franklin Belew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Myth> On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 02:57:30PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> lots of neat stuff>
Myth> Can we add a section on shared objects that are merely plugins
Myth> or components of a larger program? For example: xmms plugins,
Myth
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 02:57:30PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Can we add a section on shared objects that are merely plugins or components
of a larger program?
For example: xmms plugins, and mozilla xpcom objects
Frank aka Myth
Hi,
I went through the packaging manual, and these are the parts I
think belong in policy (I had the full text for these sections in
this message, but I was afraid it would pass the max message size
limit). I am also ambivalent about sections like 4.1 "Syntax of
control files". That se
9 matches
Mail list logo
