Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Well, part of the difficulty in classifying this material is > that one has to make the judement call on whether the things being > referred to are supposed to be standard API's that shall not be > lightly changed, and thus viable policy items, or they are merely the > artifacts of current behaviour of the packaging system.
Agreed. What I would like to do is introduce changes in a dpkg reference manual, and once they have settled done suggest copying them into the policy manual. That gives me the freedom to make changes, while keeping a stable policy manual. It does mean some duplication of text, but I think we can manage that. Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
