Bug#774384: marked as done (developers-reference: soften advice to justify retirement to debian-private)

2018-07-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2018 16:39:27 +0200 with message-id <990d30db-2567-27d6-8e3c-9c3c7495b...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#774384: developers-reference: soften advice to justify retirement to debian-private has caused the Debian Bug report #774384, regarding developers-ref

Bug#636383: marked as done (debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified)

2017-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 30 Nov 2017 22:49:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#636383: fixed in debian-policy 4.1.2.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #636383, regarding debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2017-11-30 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 at 16:04:17 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Shared object files (often .so files) that are not > public libraries, that is, they are not meant to be linked > to by third party executables (binaries of other packages), > - should be installed in subdi

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2017-10-14 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Sat, Oct 14 2017, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Seconded. Thanks. > Triviality: could you please (in the changelog, upgrading checklist, > etc) word this change to mean "allow private libraries to be placed in > a multiarch location" rather than "disallow priva

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2017-10-14 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
e > stripped. Seconded. Triviality: could you please (in the changelog, upgrading checklist, etc) word this change to mean "allow private libraries to be placed in a multiarch location" rather than "disallow private libraries to be places directly under /usr/lib/" wh

Processed: Re: Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2017-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 +patch Bug #636383 [debian-policy] debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified Added tag(s) patch. -- 636383: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636383 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2017-10-14 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 +patch Hello, On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 04:33:56PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > How about the attached patch ? Do you think it is clear enough that > /usr/lib/triplet is not allowed ? Seconded: diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml index b8db0ab..d0baa1b 100644 --- a/policy.sg

[developers-reference] 01/01: rephrase to be less inviting to send private mails (instead of using established channels)

2016-05-10 Thread Holger Levsen
private mails (instead of using established channels) --- pkgs.dbk | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/pkgs.dbk b/pkgs.dbk index ccf45d5..15fd996 100644 --- a/pkgs.dbk +++ b/pkgs.dbk @@ -2011,8 +2011,8 @@ many people will be very unhappy about it. Have you

Processed: Re: Bug#774384: developers-reference: soften advice to justify retirement to debian-private

2015-01-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #774384 [developers-reference] developers-reference: soften advice to justify retirement to debian-private Added tag(s) pending. -- 774384: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774384 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#774384: developers-reference: soften advice to justify retirement to debian-private

2015-01-03 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
;should" requirement. It's still necessary to mail > > debian-private, just not to include any justification. > > Hi Jonathan, > > since the Developers Reference is on collab-maint now, and since your > proposition was greeted with a large number of appreciations th

Bug#774384: developers-reference: soften advice to justify retirement to debian-private

2015-01-03 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Jan 01, 2015 at 09:49:22PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit : > > Please consider the attached patch, which rewords the advice into a courtesy > mail rather than a "should" requirement. It's still necessary to mail > debian-private, just not to include any

Bug#774384: developers-reference: soften advice to justify retirement to debian-private

2015-01-02 Thread Guillem Jover
On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 14:05:57 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Jonathan Wiltshire , 2015-01-01, 21:49: > >-Send an gpg-signed email about why you are leaving the project to > >-debian-private@&lists-host;. > >+Send an gpg-signed email announcing your retirement to >

Bug#774384: developers-reference: soften advice to justify retirement to debian-private

2015-01-02 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
On 2015-01-02 at 17:51 (CET), Russ Allbery wrote: > Cyril Brulebois writes: > > Jakub Wilk (2015-01-02): > >> * Jonathan Wiltshire , 2015-01-01, 21:49: > > >>> -Send an gpg-signed email about why you are leaving the project to > >>> -debian-private@

Bug#774384: developers-reference: soften advice to justify retirement to debian-private

2015-01-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Cyril Brulebois writes: > Jakub Wilk (2015-01-02): >> * Jonathan Wiltshire , 2015-01-01, 21:49: >>> -Send an gpg-signed email about why you are leaving the project to >>> -debian-private@&lists-host;. >>> +Send an gpg-signed email announcing your retir

Bug#774384: developers-reference: soften advice to justify retirement to debian-private

2015-01-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 02 Jan 2015, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Jakub Wilk (2015-01-02): > > * Jonathan Wiltshire , 2015-01-01, 21:49: > > > -Send an gpg-signed email about why you are leaving the project to > > > -debian-private@&lists-host;. > > > +Send an gpg-si

Bug#774384: developers-reference: soften advice to justify retirement to debian-private

2015-01-02 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Jakub Wilk (2015-01-02): > * Jonathan Wiltshire , 2015-01-01, 21:49: > > -Send an gpg-signed email about why you are leaving the project to > > -debian-private@&lists-host;. > > +Send an gpg-signed email announcing your retirement to > > +debian-private@&l

Bug#774384: developers-reference: soften advice to justify retirement to debian-private

2015-01-02 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jonathan Wiltshire , 2015-01-01, 21:49: -Send an gpg-signed email about why you are leaving the project to -debian-private@&lists-host;. +Send an gpg-signed email announcing your retirement to +debian-private@&lists-host;. It's courteous, but not essential, +to include a brief e

Bug#774384: developers-reference: soften advice to justify retirement to debian-private

2015-01-01 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
plies to leaving Debian. The developer's reference §3.2.5 currently says that one should "make sure to [...] send an email about why you are leaving the project to debian-private". IMO, this places undue onus on the developer to justify their retirement where he or she may not wi

Processed: clarify shared library policy for private libraries

2013-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 700759 debian-policy Bug #700759 [tech-ctte] Shared library policy on private libs Bug reassigned from package 'tech-ctte' to 'debian-policy'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #700759 to the same

Processed: Re: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 636383 -1 Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified Bug 636383 cloned as bug 650974. > retitle -1 policy: replace "/usr/lib" by some expression that encompasses > mu

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-04 Thread Jonathan Nieder
clone 636383 -1 retitle -1 policy: replace "/usr/lib" by some expression that encompasses multiarch directories, too quit Charles Plessy wrote: > How about the attached patch ? Do you think it is clear enough that > /usr/lib/triplet is not allowed ? Technically it never says so, but I think it

Re: Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-04 Thread Simon McVittie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 at 16:33:56 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml > index b8db0ab..d0baa1b 100644 > --- a/policy.sgml > +++ b/policy.sgml > @@ -7697,8 +7697,9 @@ strip --strip-unneeded your-lib > Shared obj

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-03 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 10:20:41AM +, Simon McVittie a écrit : > On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 at 15:17:29 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > We could resolve this by either disallowing to use > > /usr/lib/triplet, or by explaining that the > > subdirectory must be private to the p

Re: Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-03 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 at 15:17:29 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > We could resolve this by either disallowing to use > /usr/lib/triplet, or by explaining that the > subdirectory must be private to the package or to a set of collaborating > packages, as the non-public libraries themselv

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-02 Thread Charles Plessy
> is fine, which is clearly wrong. Good point. We could resolve this by either disallowing to use /usr/lib/triplet, or by explaining that the subdirectory must be private to the package or to a set of collaborating packages, as the non-public libraries themselves. What is your preference ?

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-02 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Charles Plessy wrote: > Would you or somebody eles mind if I close this bug report ? I would mind. The current wording implies that installing a non-public library directly under /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ is fine, which is clearly wrong. Regards, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-02 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 10:07:40PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode a écrit : > > Policy 10.2 states: > "Shared object files (often .so files) that are not public libraries, > that is, they are not meant to be linked to by third party executables > (binaries of other packages), should be installed in

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-08-02 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Package: debian-policy Severity: normal Policy 10.2 states: "Shared object files (often .so files) that are not public libraries, that is, they are not meant to be linked to by third party executables (binaries of other packages), should be installed in subdirectories of the /usr/lib directory.

Bug#548823: marked as done (devref: please point to text file to get #debian-private password)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#548823: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #548823, regarding devref: please point to text file to get #debian-private password to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: Re: Bug#548823: devref: please point to text file to get #debian-private password

2010-01-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 548823 + pending Bug #548823 [developers-reference] devref: please point to text file to get #debian-private password Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tr

Bug#548823: devref: please point to text file to get #debian-private password

2010-01-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog
tag 548823 + pending thanks On Sat, 17 Oct 2009, gregor herrmann wrote: > > btw, it's master.debian.org:/home/debian/misc/irc-password > > I might provide a patch, tho I'm assuming it wouldn't be very hard for > > the devref maintainers to just change it... > > Let's try to make their lives easie

Processed: Re: Bug#548823: devref: please point to text file to get #debian-private password

2009-10-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 548823 + patch Bug #548823 [developers-reference] devref: please point to text file to get #debian-private password Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#548823: devref: please point to text file to get #debian-private password

2009-10-16 Thread gregor herrmann
tag 548823 + patch thanks On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:24:29 -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote: > > > instead of wasting peoples time, making them read through > > > debian-private list archives, trying 3 wrong passwords until they > > > finally discover that they could have figur

Bug#548823: devref: please point to text file to get #debian-private password

2009-10-16 Thread Ryan Niebur
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 08:37:39AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Ryan Niebur wrote: > > instead of wasting peoples time, making them read through > > debian-private list archives, trying 3 wrong passwords until they > > finally discover that they could hav

Bug#548823: devref: please point to text file to get #debian-private password

2009-09-29 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Ryan Niebur wrote: > instead of wasting peoples time, making them read through > debian-private list archives, trying 3 wrong passwords until they > finally discover that they could have figured it out much, much easier > if devref had not mislead them. Sounds r

Bug#548823: devref: please point to text file to get #debian-private password

2009-09-28 Thread Ryan Niebur
Package: developers-reference Version: 3.4.3 Severity: normal instead of wasting peoples time, making them read through debian-private list archives, trying 3 wrong passwords until they finally discover that they could have figured it out much, much easier if devref had not mislead them

Bug#32263: Private Invite from Shannon

2005-12-22 Thread Shannon
You have been invited to join our dating network by Shannon http://www.zestydating.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Du hast eine private Nachricht erhalten! ID Uvsqtjberp

2003-09-08 Thread Freunde
Hi und Hallo, Ihnen wurde eine Einladung (Kennung Ijbacn) über unser Online Kontakt System zugesendet! Um Ihre Einladung anzunehmen, klicken Sie auf folgende Webseite: Webseite: http://www.topfreespace.com/KontaktBox/ Viel Spass & Erfolg Service Team Online Kontakt Systeme HINWEISE: Sie erhal

PRIVATE

2002-05-06 Thread MRS. MARIAM SESE-SEKO
FROM:MRS. M. SESE-SEKO DEAR FRIEND, I AM MRS. MARIAM SESE-SEKO WIDOW OF LATE PRESIDENT MOBUTU SESE-SEKO OF ZAIRE? NOW KNOWN AS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO (DRC). I AM MOVED TO WRITE YOU THIS LETTER, THIS WAS IN CONFIDENCE CONSIDERING MY PRESENT CIRCUMSTANCE AND SITUATION. I ESCAPED A

Re: Moving topics from debian-private (was Re: SPI money out)

1997-12-16 Thread Gonzalo A. Diethelm
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This will remove the need for so many CCs on the lists (which many > people with expensive net access hate), stop replies from moving into > private email from default (which is both good and bad), still allows > people behind broken firewall

Moving topics from debian-private (was Re: SPI money out)

1997-12-16 Thread Tyson Dowd
y-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Becomes To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This will remove the need for so many CCs on the lists (which many people with expensive net access hate), stop replies from moving into private email from default (which