Re: FWD: dh_compress

1999-11-07 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 02:20:50AM -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > > I more often use "more" or "less" to read documents, and if either > > of those were to decompress everything read, I imagine someone out > > there would be upset. > > Just FYI, it's easy to use the LESSOPEN feature to make such

Re: FWD: dh_compress

1999-11-07 Thread Chip Salzenberg
According to Seth R Arnold: > I more often use "more" or "less" to read documents, and if either > of those were to decompress everything read, I imagine someone out > there would be upset. Just FYI, it's easy to use the LESSOPEN feature to make such decompression automatic. -- Chip Salzenberg

Re: ot: debhelper (Re: FWD: dh_compress)

1999-11-07 Thread Joey Hess
Edward Betts wrote: > > Well, sure. The problem is that in this particular case, "leaving it up to > > the developer" means leaving it up to _me_ for 70% of all packages. So I > > want to get it right. > > I remember it passed the 50% mark but 70%? are you sure. It's at about 69% > No, how about

ot: debhelper (Re: FWD: dh_compress)

1999-11-06 Thread Edward Betts
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > If I recall the discussion that went on before that was > > included in policy correctly, we decided to let that be the decision > > of the developer (there is something to be said about allowing the > > developer some le

Re: FWD: dh_compress

1999-11-06 Thread Joey Hess
Manoj Srivastava wrote: > If I recall the discussion that went on before that was > included in policy correctly, we decided to let that be the decision > of the developer (there is something to be said about allowing the > developer some leeway ;-). Well, sure. The problem is that in t

Re: FWD: dh_compress

1999-11-05 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joey> Policy says that "small" files should be compressed, but does Joey> not define small. The default blocksize seems like a good Joey> definition. What is the default blocksize? 1k? 4k? Variable? I Joey> have heard all three answers.

Re: FWD: dh_compress

1999-11-05 Thread Drake Diedrich
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 05:05:04PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > > How do you plan to read a compressed copyright file for gzip to determine if > you agree with gzip's copyright and agree with it, to know if you can even > use gzip? > How are you going to get the copyright out of a .deb or base.t

Re: FWD: dh_compress

1999-11-05 Thread Joseph Carter
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 11:14:35AM +0100, Massimo Dal Zotto wrote: > > I understand the theoretical 4095 byte file, but if you changed it to 2k > > there would be the theoretical 2047 byte file and the 1023 byte file ... > > IMO it ain't broke, soo... > > I don't agree. > > The default ext2 block

Re: FWD: dh_compress

1999-11-05 Thread Joey Hess
Massimo Dal Zotto wrote: > The default ext2 blocksize is 1k and very few people change it. That's not so. I've looked at the source to mke2fs and experimented and the default size varies between 1k and 4k, depending on the size of the partition. 1 GB partitions get 4k blocks, 100 mb partitions, 1k

Re: FWD: dh_compress

1999-11-04 Thread Massimo Dal Zotto
> On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 09:26:46PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > > I just want to know the definition of "small". > > I presonally like the 4k definition. The default blocksize used on a > partition DOES vary based on the size of the partition, and nothing > smaller than 4k is going to benefit seri

Re: FWD: dh_compress

1999-11-03 Thread Joseph Carter
On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 09:26:46PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > I just want to know the definition of "small". I presonally like the 4k definition. The default blocksize used on a partition DOES vary based on the size of the partition, and nothing smaller than 4k is going to benefit seriously from b

Re: FWD: dh_compress

1999-11-02 Thread Laurent Martelli
> "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joey> Laurent Martelli wrote: >> Shouldn't all programs that can display doc files handle >> compressed files natively ? Having to manually uncompress the >> file or use a special command that handles compressed files is >> unconvenie

Re: FWD: dh_compress

1999-11-02 Thread Joey Hess
Laurent Martelli wrote: > Shouldn't all programs that can display doc files handle compressed > files natively ? Having to manually uncompress the file or use a > special command that handles compressed files is unconvenient, > especially for beginners who might even not be able to read those > fil

Re: FWD: dh_compress

1999-11-02 Thread Seth R Arnold
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 02:19:26AM +0100, Laurent Martelli wrote: > > "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Joey> Policy says that "small" files should be compressed, but does > Joey> not define small. The default blocksize seems like a good > Joey> definition. What is the

Re: FWD: dh_compress

1999-11-02 Thread Laurent Martelli
> "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joey> Policy says that "small" files should be compressed, but does Joey> not define small. The default blocksize seems like a good Joey> definition. What is the default blocksize? 1k? 4k? Variable? I Joey> have heard all three answers.

FWD: dh_compress

1999-11-02 Thread Joey Hess
Policy says that "small" files should be compressed, but does not define small. The default blocksize seems like a good definition. What is the default blocksize? 1k? 4k? Variable? I have heard all three answers. I'm considering changing debhelper to compress doc files > 1k, which is surely the sm