Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > If I recall the discussion that went on before that was > > included in policy correctly, we decided to let that be the decision > > of the developer (there is something to be said about allowing the > > developer some leeway ;-). > > Well, sure. The problem is that in this particular case, "leaving it up to > the developer" means leaving it up to _me_ for 70% of all packages. So I > want to get it right.
I remember it passed the 50% mark but 70%? are you sure. > Now, I could pass the buck by letting this be tunable in debhelper, but that > seems silly. No, how about the abilty to set the default with debconf when debhelper is being installed. Now that would be silly. -- I consume, therefore I am
