Bug#91260: PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS

2001-03-25 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 03:29:14PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > --- policy.sgml Sun Mar 25 01:34:33 2001 > > > +++ policy.sgml.x-and-fhs Sun Mar 25 03:34:00 2001 > > > > > - This means that files must not be installed into > > > - /usr/X11R6/bin/, /usr/X11R6/lib/, or > > > - /u

Bug#91260: PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS

2001-03-25 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 10:17:02PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 03:38:44AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > --- policy.sgml Sun Mar 25 01:34:33 2001 > > +++ policy.sgml.x-and-fhs Sun Mar 25 03:34:00 2001 > > > - This means that files must not be installed into

Bug#91260: PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS

2001-03-25 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 03:38:44AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > --- policy.sgml Sun Mar 25 01:34:33 2001 > +++ policy.sgml.x-and-fhs Sun Mar 25 03:34:00 2001 > - This means that files must not be installed into > - /usr/X11R6/bin/, /usr/X11R6/lib/, or > - /usr/X11R6

Bug#91260: PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS

2001-03-25 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: debian-policy > Version: 3.5.2.0 > Severity: wishlist > > * /usr/X11R6 is part of the FHS, so it is wrong for Debian Policy to imply > that it isn't; this fixes that > * this still tells packages to get out of /usr/X11R6 if they

Bug#91260: [PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS

2001-03-25 Thread Branden Robinson
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.5.2.0 Severity: wishlist * /usr/X11R6 is part of the FHS, so it is wrong for Debian Policy to imply that it isn't; this fixes that * this still tells packages to get out of /usr/X11R6 if they can * this makes an exemption for imake-using packages explicit, and e