Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 83977 [AMENDMENT 26/04/2001] include Perl Policy
Bug#83977: [PROPOSED] include Perl Policy
Changed Bug title.
> severity 83977 normal
Bug#83977: [AMENDMENT 26/04/2001] include Perl Policy
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopp
retitle 83977 [AMENDMENT 26/04/2001] include Perl Policy
severity 83977 normal
thanks
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 10:39:51AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>Please first file a bug against debhelper (dh_perl) to implement this
>and any other changes to Perl Policy since version 1.15, and then
>change the
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 02:37:04AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> Final revision of the Perl policy. Full text at:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl-policy/perl-policy.sgml
>
> This version incorporates the following major changes:
>
> * arch-indep modules need to declare a minimum depe
Final revision of the Perl policy. Full text at:
http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl-policy/perl-policy.sgml
This version incorporates the following major changes:
* Indicate that the INSTALLDIRS option may be passed via the
PERL_MM_OPT environment variable (Ben Gertzfield).
* arch-in
Removed shorttags. New version at:
http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl-policy/perl-policy.sgml
Regards,
--
Brendan O'Deabod@compusol.com.au
Compusol Pty. Limited (NSW, Australia) +61 2 9810 3633
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 11:28:36AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 01:44:42PM +1100, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
>> Update to specify build-depends for perl. Current version is at
>>
>> http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl-policy/perl-policy.sgml
>
>You've got loads of examples of t
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 01:44:42PM +1100, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> Update to specify build-depends for perl. Current version is at
>
> http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl-policy/perl-policy.sgml
You've got loads of examples of things like ... . That's not valid sgml, is it?
Julian
--
=-=-
Update to specify build-depends for perl. Current version is at
http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl-policy/perl-policy.sgml
--- perl-policy.sgml.orig Tue Feb 20 13:12:51 2001
+++ perl-policy.sgmlTue Feb 20 13:31:37 2001
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
Brendan O'Dea
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Update to include information about dh_perl. Current version is at
http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl-policy/perl-policy.sgml
--- perl-policy.sgml.orig Tue Feb 13 18:17:18 2001
+++ perl-policy.sgmlTue Feb 13 20:10:06 2001
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
Brendan O'Dea
[EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 01:04:27PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>>"Brendan" == Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Brendan> Updated version at
> Brendan> http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl/perl-policy.sgml,
>
> Looking good. I hereby second this proposal. Brendan, could
> you al
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 03:06:11PM +1100, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I've revised the perl-policy document to reflect the changes in
> packaging of both perl and modules and would like to see this document
> incorporated into debian-policy proper rather
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
>>"Brendan" == Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brendan> Updated version at
Brendan> http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl/perl-policy.sgml,
Looking good. I hereby second this proposal. Brendan, could
you also include a patch to policy p
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 04:34:31PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>>"Brendan" == Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brendan> Because such packages don't include the paths for packaged debian
> Brendan> modules, so you can't say "Depends: perl-5.005, libfoo-perl".
>
> Sure. So I can'
>>"Brendan" == Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brendan> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 01:10:54PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> What is the rationale for requiring packages *not* to declare
>> a dependency on previous versions of perl? If I have a perl script
>> that depends on perl5.00
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 01:10:54PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>What is the rationale for requiring packages *not* to declare
> a dependency on previous versions of perl? If I have a perl script
> that depends on perl5.005, but fails for 5.6, why _can't_ I just say
> so in the depends?
Hi,
What is the rationale for requiring packages *not* to declare
a dependency on previous versions of perl? If I have a perl script
that depends on perl5.005, but fails for 5.6, why _can't_ I just say
so in the depends?
1.3. Module Path Can you give either the default locatio
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
[Copy to Raphaël as author of the original perl-policy document]
I am working towards a new release of Perl with substantial changes to
the current perl-5.6 packaging:
deb http://people.debian.org/~bod perl/$(ARCH)/
deb-src http://people.debian.org/~
17 matches
Mail list logo
