Bug#83072: PROPOSED] tightening up the ban on /usr/X11R6 in packages

2001-01-22 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 02:02:44AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > > Just nitpicking, but I'd like to see this worded a bit different, > > perhaps as a clarification in the sense that programs compiled using > > Imakefiles will be migrat

Bug#83072: PROPOSED] tightening up the ban on /usr/X11R6 in packages

2001-01-21 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 02:02:44AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > Just nitpicking, but I'd like to see this worded a bit different, > perhaps as a clarification in the sense that programs compiled using > Imakefiles will be migrated at some point in the future, instead of > making them exe

Bug#83072: PROPOSED] tightening up the ban on /usr/X11R6 in packages

2001-01-21 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
Uhm. Sorry about the missing signature. >> "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just nitpicking, but I'd like to see this worded a bit different, > perhaps as a clarification in the sense that programs compiled using > Imakefiles will be migrated at some point in the future,

Bug#83072: PROPOSED] tightening up the ban on /usr/X11R6 in packages

2001-01-21 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Packages using the X Window System should abide by the FHS > + /usr/X11R6/man/ unless they use the imake program to > + configure themselves before compilation. Just nitpicking, but I'd like to see this worded a bit different

Bug#83072: [PROPOSED] tightening up the ban on /usr/X11R6 in packages

2001-01-21 Thread Branden Robinson
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.2.1.2 Severity: wishlist The forbids all non-imake using programs from sticking their files in /usr/X11R6. Imake is excepted because programs using it (if they are coded correctly, at least) rely wholly on the X library development files to figure out the paths t