On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 09:52:38AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > The missing architecture was my immediate thought as well, since for a
> > moment I thought ftp-master might need it, but then I realized that the
> > override settings are arch: all. So
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The missing architecture was my immediate thought as well, since for a
> moment I thought ftp-master might need it, but then I realized that the
> override settings are arch: all. So I'm ambivalent.
But apparently the wanna-build team would like to have
* Raphael Hertzog [110324 16:20]:
> > If it is only used to give hints to dak, what is the reason that this is
> > in .dsc and not in .changes? (Or perhaps even only in .changes that also
> > include a source package).
>
> Because this is information about the source package and not about the
> up
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>> If it really is in the .dsc files then it would be nice if it also
>> could include the Architecture: of those packages. That would make it
>> easier for things like reprepro to decide if there might be some binary
>> packa
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> Do I understand this correction correctly that "dpkg-source -b" will
> generate that when generating a source package.
Yes.
> This is put in the .dsc but everything that makes a Sources out of it
> will need to remove it again (or have an unnece
5 matches
Mail list logo
