* Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> [110324 16:20]:
> > If it is only used to give hints to dak, what is the reason that this is
> > in .dsc and not in .changes? (Or perhaps even only in .changes that also
> > include a source package).
>
> Because this is information about the source package and not about the
> upload.
For example until today .dsc files did not contain information about the
Section and Priority of the source package[1]. That information was only
in the .changes file (I guess because it was mostly a hint to
ftp-masters, just like this information is now, too).
> I discarded the .changes because we would duplicate the information in all
> .changes while it's not needed. Putting it only in .changes containing a
> source might be doable but that has never been done before and I'm not
> sure it's a good idea to start with ("fields appearing depending on
> whether a source is uploaded or not").
I'd rather see this as "fields only there if the upload has something to
say in this regard".
Bernhard R. Link
[1] Which is something I'm very happy if it changes[2]. Though having it as
"Package-List:\n src:<srcname>" is a bit more complicated than just
having Section and Priority fields.
[2] Currently reprepro can guess it by things like parsing a .diff file,
which is code I'd be very happy if I could remove it in some years.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110324183818.ga30...@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
