Control: tags -1 pending
Sean Whitton writes:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 02:43:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> diff --git a/policy.xml b/policy.xml
>> index 7ba5fc0..daf4c3c 100644
>> --- a/policy.xml
>> +++ b/policy.xml
>> @@ -595,7 +595,9 @@
>>Build-Depends,
>>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #587279 [debian-policy] Clarify restrictions on main to non-free
dependencies
Bug #616462 [debian-policy] debian-policy: clarify wording of parenthetical in
section 2.2.1
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
587279: https://bugs.debi
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 02:43:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> diff --git a/policy.xml b/policy.xml
> index 7ba5fc0..daf4c3c 100644
> --- a/policy.xml
> +++ b/policy.xml
> @@ -595,7 +595,9 @@
>Build-Depends,
>Build-Depends-Indep, or
>Build-Depends-Ar
Simon McVittie writes:
> On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 at 14:43:36 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Here is an updated version of the patch from earlier in this (now very
>> long) thread for discussion. I still think this is consistent with
>> previous practice and reasonable documentation of what we're curr
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 at 14:43:36 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here is an updated version of the patch from earlier in this (now very
> long) thread for discussion. I still think this is consistent with
> previous practice and reasonable documentation of what we're currently
> doing.
>
> diff --git
Raphael Geissert writes:
> After five years of letting the discussion settle down, perhaps there's
> a way to move things forward now?
> Other than the discussion about foo2zjs I think that only Bill believes
> that the new wording proposed in message #56 differs from the current
> practice.
>
Hi,
After five years of letting the discussion settle down, perhaps
there's a way to move things forward now?
Other than the discussion about foo2zjs I think that only Bill
believes that the new wording proposed in message #56 differs from the
current practice.
Moreover, as demonstrated by follo
7 matches
Mail list logo
