Hi, After five years of letting the discussion settle down, perhaps there's a way to move things forward now?
Other than the discussion about foo2zjs I think that only Bill believes that the new wording proposed in message #56 differs from the current practice. Moreover, as demonstrated by follow ups, the issue raised by Bill regarding the possibility of an accidental installation of non-free software appears to be a system configuration problem. That is, the granularity of what should or should not be taken into consideration when resolving a package's dependencies can and should be handled on the package manager's side. As such, I believe that the proposed wording is appropriate and open for seconding. Comments? Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.debian.net
