Re: Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage

1999-12-01 Thread Joey Hess
(I fondly remember my second slackware install. I had found out enough the first time around to know that the names of commands was key to learning linux. Several of the core slackware packages listed all the commands in them in their descriptions, and raced against the install to get the command n

Re: Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage

1999-12-01 Thread Chris Waters
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Chris Waters wrote: > > I think people are becoming too ready to propose grand, sweeping > > changes to policy in order to fix obscure, minor problems. > I agree. > > If you *really* want something in policy, I'd suggest: "the package > > description shoul

Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage

1999-11-30 Thread Joey Hess
Chris Waters wrote: > I think people are becoming too ready to propose grand, sweeping > changes to policy in order to fix obscure, minor problems. I agree. > If you *really* want something in policy, I'd suggest: "the package > description should list the binaries (or at least, the main binary)

Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage

1999-11-24 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
Goswin Brederlow schrieb am Dienstag, den 23. November 1999: > Policy says that any binary must come with a manpage. I would like > to have the same for packages. I'm not sure, whether such a general rule is acceptable. Think for example about the long list of libstdc++* packages: Should we wri

Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage

1999-11-24 Thread Chris Waters
Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Policy says that any binary must come with a manpage. I would like to have > the same for packages. I think I disagree. What section would be appropriate? I think people are becoming too ready to propose grand, sweeping changes to policy in order t

Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage

1999-11-24 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Ben Collins wrote: > How about someone write a script that pulls all of the packages and if > there isn't a man page matching the package name, create one using the > package's description as the content. Call it "update-packageman" or > something. shellutils contains a funky script tha

Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage

1999-11-23 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 07:31:01PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > Package: debian-policy > Version: 3.1.1.0 > Severity: wishlist > > Policy says that any binary must come with a manpage. I would like to have > the same for packages. > > I just looked for a parser generator that outputs C++ code

Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage

1999-11-23 Thread Seth R Arnold
perhaps it would be a nice extension to list all the config files owned by that package... On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 07:31:01PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > Package: debian-policy > Version: 3.1.1.0 > Severity: wishlist > > Policy says that any binary must come with a manpage. I would like t

Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage

1999-11-23 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.1.1.0 Severity: wishlist Policy says that any binary must come with a manpage. I would like to have the same for packages. I just looked for a parser generator that outputs C++ code and found pccts. After installation I tried "man pccts", but that failed. /usr/do