Chris Waters wrote: > I think people are becoming too ready to propose grand, sweeping > changes to policy in order to fix obscure, minor problems.
I agree. > If you *really* want something in policy, I'd suggest: "the package > description should list the binaries (or at least, the main binary) if > it doesn't match the package name." Then, you can use dpkg --info. Yuck. Package descriptions shouldn't become dumping grounds for every peice of information about a package. The sole purpose of a package description is to let you decide if you should install/remove a package. -- see shy jo
