Bug#442070: Policy inconsistent with reality: base subsection no longer used

Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Okay, I think this patch addresses the issues raised in this thread. > Comments? Seconds? I've now applied this patch to my Policy arch repository with Colin's modification. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Bug#442070: Policy inconsistent with reality: base subsection no longer used

Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm. If this section is removed, then the definition of priorities > should indicate that priorities required plus important make up what's > installed as a base Debian system. I think this would be a bit unclear, > though (you have to know the definition

Bug#442070: Policy inconsistent with reality: base subsection no longer used

On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 11:49:02AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I don't have time to do the wordsmithing, but I can be your expert > > witness. debian-installer (specifically, debootstrap) now simply > > installs everything with Priority: required or Pri

Bug#442070: Policy inconsistent with reality: base subsection no longer used

Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't have time to do the wordsmithing, but I can be your expert > witness. debian-installer (specifically, debootstrap) now simply > installs everything with Priority: required or Priority: important as > the base system, and has done so for some time.

Bug#442070: Policy inconsistent with reality: base subsection no longer used

On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 08:29:27PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > AFAIU, the base subsection was obsoleted with Etch (apparently, its > > removal was discussed already in 1997), and (almost) all packages moved > > to ordinary subsections, like other pac

Bug#442070: Policy inconsistent with reality: base subsection no longer used

Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Source: debian-policy > AFAIU, the base subsection was obsoleted with Etch (apparently, its > removal was discussed already in 1997), and (almost) all packages moved > to ordinary subsections, like other packages. However, it is still > listed in sect

Bug#442070: Policy inconsistent with reality: base subsection no longer used

Source: debian-policy AFAIU, the base subsection was obsoleted with Etch (apparently, its removal was discussed already in 1997), and (almost) all packages moved to ordinary subsections, like other packages. However, it is still listed in section 2.4 and referred to in section 3.7. I think pol