Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm. If this section is removed, then the definition of priorities > should indicate that priorities required plus important make up what's > installed as a base Debian system. I think this would be a bit unclear, > though (you have to know the definition in order to work out where to > find it), and so I think it would be better to keep this section but > update its text. How about this? > > <heading>Base system</heading> > > <p> > The <tt>base system</tt> is a minimum subset of the Debian > GNU/Linux system that is installed before everything else > - on a new system. Thus, only very few packages are allowed > - to go into the <tt>base</tt> section to keep the required > - disk usage very small. > + on a new system. Only very few packages are allowed to form > + part of the base system, in order to keep the required disk > + usage very small. > </p> > > <p> > - Most of these packages will have the priority value > - <tt>required</tt> or at least <tt>important</tt>, and many > - of them will be tagged <tt>essential</tt> (see below). > + The base system consists of all those packages with priority > + <tt>required</tt> or <tt>important</tt>. Many of them will > + be tagged <tt>essential</tt> (see below). > </p> > </sect> > > <sect>
This is a good idea. I've amended my proposed patch to match what you have above instead. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
