Re: Bug#40282: ae: Improper priority 'required'

1999-06-28 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Dale Scheetz wrote: > > > ae is required, as it is the only editor on the base system. This was > > discussed in the past and I understood that we were going to leave it > > alone. > > I thought "being in the base system" and "bein

Re: Bug#40282: ae: Improper priority 'required'

1999-06-28 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Dale Scheetz wrote: > ae is required, as it is the only editor on the base system. This was > discussed in the past and I understood that we were going to leave it > alone. I thought "being in the base system" and "being of required priority" were orthogonal issues. ae is in

Re: Bug#40282: ae: Improper priority 'required'

1999-06-28 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 1999-06-28, Dale Scheetz écrivait : > This was discussed in the past and I understood that we were going > to leave it alone. Yes. I submitted the bug on May 1st, before the discussion took place, but for some reason it showed up in the BTS only yesterday. Thomas. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#40282: ae: Improper priority 'required'

1999-06-28 Thread Dale Scheetz
ae is required, as it is the only editor on the base system. This was discussed in the past and I understood that we were going to leave it alone. If policy implies otherwise, we may need a clarification of the policy that makes it clear where ae stands. Personally, I have no problems setting th