On Thu, 27 May 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 1999 at 11:46:28AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > Please note (again) that I have not formally objected to your proposal
> > (i.e. by saying "I object to this proposal").
>
> All right.
Ok. As far as I'm concerned, you have three
On Thu, May 27, 1999 at 11:46:28AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > You have decided that xfree86-common has to be of standard priority.
> > > I think this is not ok because it is not needed at all.
> >
> > I have made no such decision. The decision was made for me.
> >
> > When package A has a
On Wed, 26 May 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 11:25:19AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > The fact that I am able to execute emacs or ghostscript in console mode
> > without xfree86-common shows that the dependency of xlib6g on
> > xfree86-common is not absolute, and theref
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 11:25:19AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > I still fail to see why do I need xfree86-common to execute emacs or
> > > ghostview in console mode (as I always was able to do under Debian 2.0).
> >
> > Because xlib6g depends on xfree86-common.
>
> I mean I fail to see why x
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 11:25:19AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> The fact that I am able to execute emacs or ghostscript in console mode
> without xfree86-common shows that the dependency of xlib6g on
> xfree86-common is not absolute, and therefore a "Depends:" field should
> not be used for that.
On Tue, 25 May 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 05:36:09PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Such programs should be configured with X support,
> > + and should declare a dependency on xlib6g (which
> > + contains X shared libraries). Users who wish to use the
>
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 05:36:09PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Such programs should be configured with X support,
> + and should declare a dependency on xlib6g (which
> + contains X shared libraries). Users who wish to use the
> + program can install just the relatively
On Mon, 24 May 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
Such programs should be configured with X support,
- and should declare a dependency on xlib6g (for the
- X11R6 libraries). Users who wish to use the program can
- install just the relatively small xlib6g pack
Seconded
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Debian GNU/Linux developer
PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBEThe Source Comes First!
-
Fuck, I can't compile the damn thing and I wrote it !
pgpVBEvXD
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 12:37:21AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Unified diff to the .sgml source is MIME-attached.
I second this proposal.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
Good Times are back again!
http:
This looks reasonable - seconded.
--
see shy jo
Package: debian-policy
Version: 2.5.1.0
Severity: wishlist
I have rewritten section 5.7 of the policy manual to reflect some
changes that have taken place as a result of the Great X Reorganization.
I also reworded the section on LessTif/Motif, though that's not strictly my
province. I thought ab
12 matches
Mail list logo
