Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Lacking such a move, I move that we close this report.
FWIW, I agree.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAI
Hi
>>"Bob" == Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> The most recent version of packaging-manual is 2.4.1.2, while the
Bob> most recent version of debian-policy is 2.5.0.0. I believe there has
Bob> been agreement on the policy list that these documents would maintain
Bob> paralle
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That said, I'm in favour of dropping the Standards-Version field
> entirely. It adds no information, because it's generally not kept
> up to date, and even when it says "2.5.0" it doesn't mean that
> anyone checked it for compliance with the most rec
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The most recent version of packaging-manual is 2.4.1.2, while
> > the most recent version of debian-policy is 2.5.0.0. I believe
> > there has been agreement on the policy
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The most recent version of packaging-manual is 2.4.1.2, while
> > the most recent version of debian-policy is 2.5.0.0. I believe
> > there has been agreement on the policy list that these docum
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The most recent version of packaging-manual is 2.4.1.2, while
> the most recent version of debian-policy is 2.5.0.0. I believe
> there has been agreement on the policy list that these documents
> would maintain paralle
Package: packaging-manual
Version: 2.4.1.2
Severity: wishlist
The most recent version of packaging-manual is 2.4.1.2, while the
most recent version of debian-policy is 2.5.0.0. I believe there has
been agreement on the policy list that these documents would maintain
parallel version numbers
7 matches
Mail list logo
