On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 11:43:33AM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> I second it as well. I think it provides a nice core to what is added
> as "description best practices" in developers-reference. I don't
> believe there are any contradictions between the two.
Thanks. It's already committed, and wil
I second it as well. I think it provides a nice core to what is added
as "description best practices" in developers-reference. I don't
believe there are any contradictions between the two.
--
...Adam Di Carlo...<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>
Hi,
Do I hear any seconds to this proposal?
For the record, I second the proposed change.
manoj
trying to recall what the policy process document said to do
--
TAPPING? You POLITICIANS! Don't you realize that the END of the
"Wash Cycle" is a TREASURED MOMENT for mo
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 06:27:55PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> ...
> > +The single line synopsis
> >
> >
> > The single line synopsis should be kept brief - certainly
The line that follows is:
under 80 characters.
This is a sufficient restriction IMO.
--
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 09:06:50PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
...
> +The single line synopsis
>
>
> The single line synopsis should be kept brief - certainly
> @@ -2397,6 +2421,10 @@
> informative as you can.
>
I think "short" or "single line" is
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:33:06PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Package: debian-policy
> >
> > The dropping of the packaging manual seems increasinly hasty and
> > ill-thought-out, when important documentation like this turns out to
> > have been dropped from debian in the proc
Josip Rodin wrote:
> How about the attached patch?
Looks good to me.
--
see shy jo
pgp42gc2sLVVN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
How about the attached patch?
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Index: policy.sgml
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-policy/debian-policy/policy.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.86
diff -u -w -u -r1.86 policy.sgml
--- policy.sg
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:33:06PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
>
> The dropping of the packaging manual seems increasinly hasty and
> ill-thought-out, when important documentation like this turns out to
> have been dropped from debian in the process.
Get your facts straight b
Package: debian-policy
The dropping of the packaging manual seems increasinly hasty and
ill-thought-out, when important documentation like this turns out to
have been dropped from debian in the process. This should probably go
into the policy manual's appendices.
- Forwarded message from John
10 matches
Mail list logo
