>>"Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I see. Anything your parochial. limited, MUA can't render is
>> gibberish.
Robbe> Obviously, since I'm not able to interpret raw UTF8 sequences beyond
Robbe> U+007F in my head. You X-Face is surely to people without the right
Robbe
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mail setups that do not understand MIME are antiquated to the point
> that most email must be hard to deal with.
Fine by me.
> Robbe> But you were using characters outside ASCII as well, so one
> Robbe> needs tools to turn them from UTF8 gibberi
Hi,
*Sigh*. I guess any initiative without a flame war would be
un-debian. Who am I, then, to flaunt tradition?
>>"Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robbe> Obviously MIME is mandatory for participation in policy
Robbe> process I infer from your "Fix your MUA" com
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Robbe> Is Unicode manadatory now? (You somewhat incorrecly used
> Robbe> U+2010, hyphen, in that mail.)
>
>
> Mandatory? mandated by whom?
Obviously MIME is mandatory for participation in policy process I
infer from your "Fix your MUA" comm
>>"Brendan" == Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brendan> See Bug#160054. I forgot to back-whack some hyphens in the debsums
Brendan> manpage and groff helpfully translated them to a unicode glyph.
Yes. But there are other reasons when mails get quoted
printable. Like when the
>>"Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> Er, manoj, it'd help if you mailed the bts bug# when you
Adam> responded to bugs. You then don't need to mail -policy at all,
Adam> as the bts will forward all mails sent to a bug to the
Adam> maintainer(which -policy is, in this case).
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 05:08:54PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>>"Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Robbe> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> shite? Fix your own darned MUA.
>
> Robbe> Is Unicode manadatory now? (You somewhat incorrecly used
> Robbe> U+20
>>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 05:53:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> there are only two lines or original content in the message, one
>> asking which earlier mail (look into -policy archives), and the
Matthew> i have looked at
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 05:53:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> there are only two lines or original content in the message, one
> asking which earlier mail (look into -policy archives), and the
i have looked at the archive. none of the thread titles seem germane.
could you give a hint whic
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Matthew> i don't know what mailing list manoj is so arrogantly
> Matthew> assuming i read, but i'm clearly not subscribed.
>
> You filed a bug against debian policy. Debian policy is
>>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> i don't know what mailing list manoj is so arrogantly
Matthew> assuming i read, but i'm clearly not subscribed.
You filed a bug against debian policy. Debian policy issues
are dealy with on the debian-policy mai
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> i don't know what mailing list manoj is so arrogantly assuming i read,
> but i'm clearly not subscribed. did he respond to the other point i made?
-policy.
>>"Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> >>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Matthew> can you not use unprintably-encoded mime shite? it's hard to read.
>>
>> shite? Fix your own darned MUA. (Actually,
i don't know what mailing list manoj is so arrogantly assuming i read,
but i'm clearly not subscribed. did he respond to the other point i made?
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 05:30:57PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> > >>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Matthew> can you not use unprintably-encoded mime shite? it's hard to
> > read.
> >
> > shite? Fix your own darned MUA. (Actually, the
>>"Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robbe> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> shite? Fix your own darned MUA.
Robbe> Is Unicode manadatory now? (You somewhat incorrecly used
Robbe> U+2010, hyphen, in that mail.)
Mandatory? mandated by whom? As the
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Matthew> can you not use unprintably-encoded mime shite? it's hard to read.
>
> shite? Fix your own darned MUA. (Actually, the breakage maybe
> in debbugs, since I see my original m
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> shite? Fix your own darned MUA.
Is Unicode manadatory now? (You somewhat incorrecly used U+2010, hyphen,
in that mail.)
--
Robbe
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature
>>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> can you not use unprintably-encoded mime shite? it's hard to read.
shite? Fix your own darned MUA. (Actually, the breakage maybe
in debbugs, since I see my original message to -policy just fine, but
the message retrans
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 12:48:06AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Perusuant to my message earlier, there are the first set of
> pending bug reports.
what message earlier?
> * #132767: debsum support should be mandatory
>Package: debian-policy; Reported by: Matth
20 matches
Mail list logo
