> Hi,
>
> Iff we agree that the packaging manual has the weight of
> Policy, I propose, as a purely packaging issue, to pull the two
> packages (not the documents -- the policy and the packaging manuals
> shall remain distinct documents). The policy manual package already
> contains the
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Iff we agree that the packaging manual has the weight of
> Policy, I propose, as a purely packaging issue, to pull the two
> packages (not the documents -- the policy and the packaging manuals
> shall remain distinct documents). The policy m
Hi,
>>"Robert" == Robert Woodcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> Ok, reading through those a few times, I see that Manoj said in
Robert> http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-policy-9809/msg00072.html:
Robert> "I hope I am not incorrect in assuming that the debian-policy,
Robert> p
Hi,
>>"Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This act by itself I do not have any problem with. I would not complain if
>> the two documents were in the same package. However, pretending the
>> Packaging Manual is policy is a bad idea. It was a reference guide
>> previously.
Joey
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Robert> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> If we agree that the packaging manual has the weight of Policy,
> Robert> Currently it does not.
>
> Says who? This mailing list agreed that the packagingn manual
> has the weight of policy, and that was announced on debian-devel
Robert Woodcock wrote:
> [Manoj - sorry about the extra message in your inbox. Forgot to send it to
> the list the first time around]
>
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > If we agree that the packaging manual has the weight of
> > Policy,
>
> Currently it does not. Someone needs to go over it with
Hi,
>>"Robert" == Robert Woodcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> If we agree that the packaging manual has the weight of Policy,
We already have been thorugh this, this was a matter of
form. The only forum that can decide what constitutes Debian policy
[Manoj - sorry about the extra message in your inbox. Forgot to send it to
the list the first time around]
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> If we agree that the packaging manual has the weight of
> Policy,
Currently it does not. Someone needs to go over it with a fine-toothed comb
to pick out non-
Hi there...
What about people who are not debian developers but who want to make local
debian packages? (forexample: admin folx who want to document/package THEIR
policy w/o being tied to debian policy: we all KNOW that these will/do exist)
(Note in general: I think some debian practices go again
Hi,
Iff we agree that the packaging manual has the weight of
Policy, I propose, as a purely packaging issue, to pull the two
packages (not the documents -- the policy and the packaging manuals
shall remain distinct documents). The policy manual package already
contains the FSSTND docu
10 matches
Mail list logo
