Re: [3.0.0.0] Policy manual copyright notice.

Hi, >>"Chris" == Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Chris> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Could the people in the CC: field so assign the copyrights? Chris> I'm not sure mine needs it; my proposal was basically copied (with Chris> some minor editing) from /usr/doc/menu/

Re: [3.0.0.0] Policy manual copyright notice.

Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Well, since the copyright holders have not been actively > involved in the newest phase of the manual.Should I make it copyright > Debian? the debian policy list? spi? Since Debian legally doesn't exist you should probably assign the copyright to SPI

Re: [3.0.0.0] Policy manual copyright notice.

Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Could the people in the CC: field so assign the copyrights? I'm not sure mine needs it; my proposal was basically copied (with some minor editing) from /usr/doc/menu/menu.sgml. But I'm certainly willing to do so if necessary. Just let me kn

Re: [3.0.0.0] Policy manual copyright notice.

Hi, >>"Gord" == Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: "Steve" == Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steve> I'd be happy to see "Debian". "The Debian Policy List" seems Steve> too nebulous, and SPI seems to out-of-the-loop. Gord> Just don't forget that copyright can only

Re: [3.0.0.0] Policy manual copyright notice.

> Manoj Srivastava writes: >>> "Steve" == Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steve> I'd be happy to see "Debian". "The Debian Policy List" seems Steve> too nebulous, and SPI seems to out-of-the-loop. Just don't forget that copyright can only be assigned to legal entities. ``Debi

Re: [3.0.0.0] Policy manual copyright notice.

Hi, >>"Steve" == Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steve> I'd be happy to see "Debian". "The Debian Policy List" seems too Steve> nebulous, and SPI seems to out-of-the-loop. Steve> Hmmm, is it necessary that contributors formally assign Steve> copyright to whoever ? I would

Re: [3.0.0.0] Policy manual copyright notice.

On 27-Jul-99, 14:50 (CDT), Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, since the copyright holders have not been actively > involved in the newest phase of the manual.Should I make it copyright > Debian? the debian policy list? spi? I'd be happy to see "Debian". "The Debian

Re: [3.0.0.0] Policy manual copyright notice.

Hi, >>"Karl" == Karl M Hegbloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Karl> I just updated to the newest version of `debian-policy', and noticed Karl> that the copyright date is `1998'. Shouldn't that be updated? -- Debian GNU/Linux

[3.0.0.0] Policy manual copyright notice.

I just updated to the newest version of `debian-policy', and noticed that the copyright date is `1998'. Shouldn't that be updated?