Hi,
>>"Gord" == Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>> "Steve" == Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> I'd be happy to see "Debian". "The Debian Policy List" seems
Steve> too nebulous, and SPI seems to out-of-the-loop.
Gord> Just don't forget that copyright can only be assigned to legal
Gord> entities. ``Debian'' is not a legal entity, but an individual or an
Gord> ``Inc.'' like SPI is.
Gord> If you put something like `Copyright (C) 1999 The Debian Project',
Gord> without naming a legal entity, then it'll probably be treated as a
Gord> pseudonym, which has different meanings in different countries.
I guess since SPI was created to be the legal entity for
Debian, and to hold the money etc for the project, that should be OK.
Steve> Hmmm, is it necessary that contributors formally assign
Steve> copyright to whoever ?
Gord> For significant (say, more than 40 line) changes, either their
Gord> name as an individual should be added, or else an assignment
Gord> should be made. Informal assignments are probably fine:
Gord> something like ``by submitting a proposal, you agree to assign
Gord> your changes to Software in the Public Interest, Inc.''
Could the people in the CC: field so assign the copyrights?
These are the people who had significant input to the policy document
recently. I would rather that we have people assign the copyright to
SPI, rather than have a burgeoning list of copyright holders. Should
we create a list of contributors to the policy document, instead?
manoj
--
A coward is a hero with a wife, kids, and a mortgage. -- Marvin
Kitman
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
