Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two

2006-11-23 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 06:37:52PM +0100, David Weinehall wrote: > Somehow I doubt that you used today's version of bash (which I bet > is a lot bigger and more memory-consuming due to new features). Comparing bash from woody and sid, respectively: -rwxr-xr-x root/root511400 2002-04-08 21:07

Re: Bug#397939: Proposal: Packages must have a working clean target

2006-11-12 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:50:24PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: >>> We frown on autogenerated debian/control's for similar >>> reasons, right? >> Yes, but we don't frown upon autogenerated .o files. > Uh... we don't? No, we even ship this huge "gcc" thing whose primary goal is to autogenerate .o