On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 06:37:52PM +0100, David Weinehall wrote: > Somehow I doubt that you used today's version of bash (which I bet > is a lot bigger and more memory-consuming due to new features).
Comparing bash from woody and sid, respectively: -rwxr-xr-x root/root 511400 2002-04-08 21:07 ./bin/bash -rwxr-xr-x root/root 677184 2006-10-22 15:55 ./bin/bash RSS of woody's bash is 4528 kB on my system; 4888 kB for sid's bash. So, unless you want to claim that 162 kB bigger and using 8% more memory is "a lot", you should probably be less careless about your betting. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
