[repost, in case the seconds should be signed. they probably
should. if so, stating that somewhere in the developer corner
would be great. or did I miss something?]
hi,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:53:35PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> --- policy.sgml.orig 2002-11-12 12:50:40.0 +
> +++
hi,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:53:35PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> --- policy.sgml.orig 2002-11-12 12:50:40.0 +
> +++ policy.sgml 2002-11-12 12:51:30.0 +
> @@ -7485,22 +7485,22 @@
> page included as well.
>
>
> -
> - If no manual page is
hi,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:12:09PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:58:55PM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:26:02PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > --- policy.sgml.orig 2002-10-30 16:13:24.0 +
> > >
hi,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:26:02PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> --- policy.sgml.orig 2002-10-30 16:13:24.0 +
> +++ policy.sgml 2002-10-30 16:14:13.0 +
> @@ -7476,22 +7476,22 @@
[snip]
> + There must be a manual page at least for every program. If
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 02:39:00PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Of course policy still says we must. I don't know when we want to change
> that; now or when a lot of packages have stopped including it, or what.
because i hate not having some static place where to look how
things should be done,
hi,
while packaging modlogan i have to use overrides because modlogan
uses shared objects for its plugin system which are not shared
libs. but since there has to be a shlibs file for shared objects
under /usr/lib i get lots of lintian errors, i.e. policy
violations.
i talked to shaleh and he told
6 matches
Mail list logo
