hi, On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:12:09PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:58:55PM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:26:02PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > > --- policy.sgml.orig 2002-10-30 16:13:24.000000000 +0000 > > > +++ policy.sgml 2002-10-30 16:14:13.000000000 +0000 > > > @@ -7476,22 +7476,22 @@ > > [snip] > > > + There must be a manual page at least for every program. If > > ^^^^ > > > > you probably edited the wrong document, this should be should :). > > or did I miss something? > > Yes, you missed this: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=39830&msg=75
I didn't miss that. > I would love to see seconds to, or discussions of, my most recent > proposed diff: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=39830&msg=81 this is the updated version where you removed the TODO.Debian paragraph. and in this you have the must which I thought should be a should according to the previous diff you sent. and just afterwards you removed the TODO bit, hence it's a bit confusing. > Chris Waters said he would renew his second if I changed "must" to > "should", which I did. There have been several seconds to Roland's > original proposal. Beyond that, the discussion period I proposed expires > very soon! yeah, I'ld second this one with s/must/should/. clear now what i mean? so long Othmar
