On 15 Feb 2003 14:02:00 +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Oohara Yuuma) wrote
> on 15.02.03 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 15 Feb 2003 08:58:00 +0200,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) wrote:
> > > We have too many conflict
On 15 Feb 2003 08:58:00 +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) wrote:
> We have too many conflicting -dev packages.
Because we have the .so -> .so.x.y.z symlinks.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 08:35:42 +0900 (JST),
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not
> lib*: shared library, all symlinks to .so (including .so -> .so.x.y.z)
> and header files
> lib*-dev: static library?
I forgot that there are multiple version of the same
tive lib*-static-dev package.
Why not
lib*: shared library, all symlinks to .so (including .so -> .so.x.y.z)
and header files
lib*-dev: static library?
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
ries in this day and age, but maybe I'm
> > missing something obvious.
> zsh-static needs a static libc and ncurses
> sash needs a static libc and zlib
> busybox-static needs a static libc
> dpkg needs a static zlib
>
> Not sure what else.
integrit needs a static libc
-
program. If
> This would make it an RC bug if no man page exists. I don't think
> that's what we want. (I know it's not what I want.) Change "must" to
> "should" and I'll renew my second.
I don't know the point of "must" and "sh
On 21 Aug 2002 17:30:30 -0400,
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ifeq (,$(findstring nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
> INSTALL_PROGRAM += -s
> endif
I saw a library which did install -s *.a (already fixed).
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP
On 18 Aug 2002 20:18:43 -0400,
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + Although binaries in the build tree should be compiled with
> + debugging information by default,
How can I do it without wasting autobuilder's CPU time?
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTE
the NM queue that -fomit-frame-pointer (and -O3)
is not allowed because it causes problems on some architecture.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40
do I have to add it explicitly?
I don't want a bug filed just because -O0 is missing.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E
7;m poking at
> apt or dpkg's internals, or when I've needed to do something really weird.
You say I should read the source of dpkg when I need to do
something really weird about version number (cope with -pre and -beta,
rebuild with dbs and so on)? Digits, dots and hyphens do not
always
x-gnu come to mind as an alternative.
If a build process needs to know what is on the linux kernel is
the GNU software or not, use build dependency. I don't care
if -linux-gnu is aliasd to -linux and -linux-gnu is
preferred to -linux, but I object to mandating -linux-gnu
in the policy.
-
On Mon, 13 May 2002 01:57:55 +0900 (JST),
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2002 16:13:28 -0500,
> Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 09-May-02, 13:53 (CDT), Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > How about
u should place them in a subdirectory named
> + /usr/lib/.
seconded
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
I always put away what I take.
--- Ryuji Akai, "Star away"
pgpWWILHuVQvr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
14 matches
Mail list logo
