On Mon, 13 May 2002 01:57:55 +0900 (JST), Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 10 May 2002 16:13:28 -0500, > Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 09-May-02, 13:53 (CDT), Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > How about simply: > > > > > > <p>If your package includes run-time support programs that don't need to > > > be invoked manually by the users, or named in a way that would cause > > > conflicts if placed in <tt>$PATH</tt>, but are nevertheless required for > > >- the package to function, you should place them in a subdirectory of > > >- <file>/usr/lib</file>.</p> > > > > + the package to function, you should place them in a subdirectory named > > + <file>/usr/lib/<pkgname></file>.</p> > seconded Of course, if the program is architecture-independent (for example, a script), it should be in /usr/share/<pkgname>, instead of /usr/lib/<pkgname>.
-- Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian developer PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695 I always put away what I take. --- Ryuji Akai, "Star away"
pgpAC5cLNqb74.pgp
Description: PGP signature
