't really think so, because in most cases, wouldn't this produce a
monstrosity like /usr/doc//more? Would having /usr/doc//copyright
and /usr/doc//-doc.copyright be acceptable?
-=- James Mastros
--
God is dead
Flowers on his grave
They're dead too
-=- Sara Mastros
On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 02:18:31PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 01:31:09AM -0400, James Mastros wrote:
> > Con: There will be a period where some packages use usr/doc and some
> > usr/share/doc, confusing users.
> > Reply: It&#x
will have to depend on a base-files with a
usr/share/doc/ directory.
Reply: Is there one that dosn't?
Any others? If so, please use the form Con:, or Pro:, and a Reply: to a
posted Con or Pro... that should keep this from becoming more circular then
it already is.
-=- James Mastros
--
We are at code S-I-G-H. Repeat, code sigh.
s do the part in the postinst, and
have dpkg depend on it.
I think that covers it. Please, don't flame me too hard.
-=- James Mastros
--
Little candle-wiccan-bunny fire good. Huge burn-down-house,
bring-Cabal-action fire bad.
ow
mu, and everybody knows mu is good for answering unanswerable questions.
-=- James Mastros
--
"They are never alone that are accompanied by a nobel thoughts."
-=- Written on the US Library of Congress
cat /dev/urandom|james --insane=yes > http://www.rtweb.net/theorb/
ICQ:
e (upstream and just took maintainership, not packaged yet), I'm
quite interested in this discussion. (Although it's somwhat moot, as the
author of that server has no explicit licence with the server, and has
dissapeared -- or at least his domain and thus the email I have for him are
dead.)
esser stability? This
obviously needs to be discused more. (For one thing, that dosn't handle
conflicts-but-does-not-replace -- but I'm not certian that that is
supportable.)
Again, disclamer: I don't really know what I'm talking about.
Not-a-developer, and fairly-new-t
7 matches
Mail list logo
