Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive

2001-01-28 Thread Jakob ¸hm
Jakob Bøhm wrote: > > Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > > However some of this is speculative, maybe someone > closer to the core should survey the existing mirrors > to check how many can actually carry crypto legally, > then it would be easier to decide whether or

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive

2001-01-28 Thread Jakob ¸hm
Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > >>"Jakob" == Jakob Bøhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jakob> The main archive is mirrored and copied around the globe both > Jakob> inside and outside SPI. Including anything which it would > Jakob> be illega

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive

2001-01-27 Thread Jakob ¸hm
Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > >>"Jakob" == Jakob Bøhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jakob> What I was proposing was, that package maintainers would > Jakob> (by some future policy change not directly related to non-us) > > Frankly, I w

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive

2001-01-27 Thread Jakob ¸hm
Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > This is wrong. If there is no problem exporting it from the > US, it shall be put on master proper (we don't care what the laws in > iran say, for example, when it comes to putting software on the sites > in the US). > > People, I know this appare

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive

2001-01-25 Thread Jakob ¸hm
Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: > > > Okay, hopefully the final language change: > > > > Proposal is to change section 2.1.5 of the Debian policy to say: > > > >Non-free programs with cryptographic program code must be stored on > >the "non-us" server because of export restrictions of the U.S.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive

2001-01-25 Thread Jakob ¸hm
Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > >>"Jakob" == Jakob Bøhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jakob> 2. Mechanical filtering on specific common issues including > Jakob> the meta-issue "other problems" becomes possible, e.g. when > Jakob>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive

2001-01-22 Thread Jakob ¸hm
Remco Blaakmeer wrote: > > > 'non-US' seems to be a misnomer nowadays (as it has been for some time > already). Should it perhaps be replaced by 'crypto' and 'patented', so > that both can be separately mirrored in different countries? > > Remco > -- Many crypto algorithms are patented, so there

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive

2001-01-21 Thread Jakob ¸hm
Placing crypto software in any part of the main archive still has a very important legal problem: Even though the US may have lifted its restrictions on crypto stuff, some other countries might not (China?, Russia?). This means three subproblems: 1. Placing crypto stuff in the "us" archive will