Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?

2003-12-08 Thread Herbert Xu
s. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?

2003-11-29 Thread Herbert Xu
s compared to the that of an epoch if it were used. In this particular instance, it is not obvious whether a package will spend most of its life as MMDD or X.Y until that switch has been made. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMA

Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?

2003-11-29 Thread Herbert Xu
YYMMDD is more elegant or requires less explanation? -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#218530: Suboptimal conditional rune for initscripts

2003-11-02 Thread Herbert Xu
to rule out aliases/functions/builtins since when invoke-rc.d is actually run those things will all be considered by the shell. Cheers, -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Re: Colons in upstream version.

2003-11-01 Thread Herbert Xu
GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#203650: Poor recommendation in dpkg-statoverride section

2003-08-04 Thread Herbert Xu
ckage was previously configured, this will allow packages declaring pre-dependencies on adduser to run their preinsts even though the new passwd is not yet available, rendering adduser useless. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} &

Bug#203650: Poor recommendation in dpkg-statoverride section

2003-08-03 Thread Herbert Xu
adduser, passwd, and perl-base > apparently only change things not affecting that particular > operation. Can you really guarantee that this will be the case in future? Remember when perl broke during the libdb upgrade? -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert

Bug#203650: Poor recommendation in dpkg-statoverride section

2003-08-01 Thread Herbert Xu
adduser's dependencies into pre-dependencies, and probably most of the things it depends on as well. You also need to ensure that adduser and anything that it depends on to function are always available at all times just like libc6. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.or

Bug#203650: Poor recommendation in dpkg-statoverride section

2003-08-01 Thread Herbert Xu
present when the package is unpacked. > Objection. There is no way to create any user in preinst as the tool to do so is not in an essential package. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http:

Bug#190749: debian-policy: /etc/init.d scripts example 'test -f program-executed-later-in-script' should be 'test -x'

2003-04-27 Thread Herbert Xu
exist is given, but it only tests if the file exists, not if it is > executable. There is no point in test executability since the test is meant to determine whether the package has been removed or not. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>H

Re: POSIX shell clarification

2002-12-22 Thread Herbert Xu
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 07:34:03PM -0500, Decklin Foster wrote: > > Thanks. Could you point me to where the correct behavior is specified? Penultimate sentence before section 2.9.1.1. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMA

Re: POSIX shell clarification

2002-12-22 Thread Herbert Xu
able assignments. To wit: > > bash$ FOO=$(false) || echo failed > failed > > dash$ FOO=$(false) && echo worked > worked This is definitely a (recent) bug in dash. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL

Re: Bug#171221: openmotif: openmotif is not a native package

2002-11-30 Thread Herbert Xu
one single tarball > instead of .orig.tar.gz + diff. Native debian packages are listed as > typical example for that, but I don't see noted that other packages are > not allowed to be packaged that way. I'm reassigning this to debian-policy so we can get a general opini

Re: Bug#171221: openmotif: openmotif is not a native package

2002-11-30 Thread Herbert Xu
/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#39830: [AMENDMENT]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks

2002-11-13 Thread Herbert Xu
don't want to see it can simply delete the symlink. They would get a warning from man of course, but that should be easy to special case in man(1). Personally I think the manual page would be useful to users new to Debian. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email:

Bug#120585: apparently what lintian does is valid, ldconfig use outside $1=configure is not documented as safe

2002-11-11 Thread Herbert Xu
tly safe to invoke ldconfig unconditionally in a postinst script. Thus it is OK for a package to simply put ldconfig in its postinst without checking $1. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apa

Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated

2002-09-19 Thread Herbert Xu
ing of POSIX > incompatibilities. It seems that posh has removed all XSI extensions. The current policy document does not explicitly state that. I do not think that there is a concensus about whether XSI extensions should be disallowed. So I object against including posh until this is clari

Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition

2002-09-07 Thread Herbert Xu
ian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

2002-06-30 Thread Herbert Xu
t to see a slow down. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

2002-06-22 Thread Herbert Xu
t interpreting back slashes. All SYSV shells behaved like printf "%b\n" "$*" This includes pdksh. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key:

Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

2002-06-21 Thread Herbert Xu
gt; | alias-name > | Write the alias definition to standard output. > > [...] ls=foo is an alias definition. alias ls=foo is a command line that represents the alias definition. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROT

Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

2002-06-20 Thread Herbert Xu
x 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

2002-06-20 Thread Herbert Xu
s > less useful, at any rate. In the case of command -v, the alias prefix is required. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herb

Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

2002-06-19 Thread Herbert Xu
o the extra new line that ash outputs after an alias? If so that is indeed incorrect and will be fixed. > > More details please. > > "%s=%s\n", name, value Will fix. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

2002-06-19 Thread Herbert Xu
use them. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject o

Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

2002-06-19 Thread Herbert Xu
output for alias More details please. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR

Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

2002-06-19 Thread Herbert Xu
epend on them, e.g., the options -a and -o, as well as parentheses for the test command or [. the obsolescent forms of kill and trap: kill -INT or kill -9. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

2002-06-19 Thread Herbert Xu
nothing against keeping the echo -n clause. > The other problem, then, is that we will have a situation wherein no shell > in Debian would be suitable as /bin/sh (unless I'm assuming incorrectly > about pdksh). Please be more specific. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.

Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

2002-06-18 Thread Herbert Xu
tory support is unlikely to affect scripting, it would be acceptable for us to specify UP as well as XSI. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor

Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

2002-06-17 Thread Herbert Xu
NU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

2002-06-16 Thread Herbert Xu
otentially serve as /bin/sh in Debian provide type and test as builtins. That includes ash. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.or

Bug#114920: PROPOSAL] remove foolish consistency in perl module names

2001-10-09 Thread Herbert Xu
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Herbert Xu wrote: >> I object. Until versioned provides work reliably, doing this prevents >> any use of versioned dependencies on such packages which may come back >> to haunt us. > If something needs to declare a versione

Bug#114920: PROPOSAL] remove foolish consistency in perl module names

2001-10-08 Thread Herbert Xu
be an abbreviated version, and the longer name put in the Provides >field. I object. Until versioned provides work reliably, doing this prevents any use of versioned dependencies on such packages which may come back to haunt us. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts

2001-09-10 Thread Herbert Xu
package should call ldconfig in the > + postrm script if the first argument is > + remove. The maintainer scripts must not invoke > + ldconfig under any circumstances other than those > + described in this paragraph. > > > Seconded. --

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts

2001-09-06 Thread Herbert Xu
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 06-Sep-01, 06:59 (CDT), Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> BTW, what is it with all the Steves in this thread? :) > Is your problem that there are so many of us, or that we seem to be > excessively dim

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts

2001-09-06 Thread Herbert Xu
nfusing. > It seems neither to me. The fact that a lot of maintainers are likely Agreed. If someone can turn that into a diff, I will second it. BTW, what is it with all the Steves in this thread? :) -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts

2001-09-06 Thread Herbert Xu
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 05-Sep-01, 16:52 (CDT), Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Vociferous Mole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > So? Isn't it a bug? This isn't a case of a policy change creating a bug, >&g

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts

2001-09-05 Thread Herbert Xu
is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts

2001-09-05 Thread Herbert Xu
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:53:20PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 06:52:55PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > > Would there be a problem with enshrining this with the following > policy simplification? Nope. It still has the same problem, i.e., all packages si

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts

2001-09-03 Thread Herbert Xu
a bucket load of RC bugs for no good reason. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#106280: packages shouldn't have to ask permission before calling MAKEDEV in postinst

2001-07-24 Thread Herbert Xu
Anthony Towns wrote: > ...or an "echo". Seconded. Better make that a printf :) -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#36151: Clearing out old policy proposals

2001-06-25 Thread Herbert Xu
GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#36151: Clearing out old policy proposals

2001-06-24 Thread Herbert Xu
t; Please see the original proposal: the problem was precisely that there > were situations where these directories were not in the PATH and this > broke the scripts. Only because the user's system was misconfigured... -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email:

Bug#36151: Clearing out old policy proposals

2001-06-22 Thread Herbert Xu
in and /usr/sbin to the PATH variable, then the default behaviour of dpkg where it fails if things like start-stop-daemon isn't found in a PATH search would stand out like sore thumb. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#36151: Clearing out old policy proposals

2001-06-20 Thread Herbert Xu
example, if the script didn't set PATH, I could put /usr/local/sbin in front of it to override start-stop-daemon. This simply isn't possible if PATH was set. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#100346: PROPOSAL] Do not mandate existence of shared libraries

2001-06-12 Thread Herbert Xu
ner speak > for himself :-) I won't bitch as long as there is nothing on my system that uses it, or at least as long as I don't know about it :) -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#100346: PROPOSAL] Do not mandate existence of shared libraries

2001-06-11 Thread Herbert Xu
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:20:48AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: >> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > and neither is libc6 because some parts of it can only be linked >> > statically. >> >

Bug#100472: PROPOSAL] allowing '-' between libraryname and soversion

2001-06-11 Thread Herbert Xu
y this also applies to the version-in-name problems > seen above (don't ask me wtf libgtrans is up to). Although the kernels aren't shared libraries, they are in the same boat and hyphens have been used there since very early on, e.g., we have kernel-source-2.4.5. -- Debian GNU/Linux

Bug#100346: PROPOSAL] Do not mandate existence of shared libraries

2001-06-10 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 01:35:30AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Herbert Xu wrote: > > Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > and neither is libc6 because some parts of it can only be linked > > > statically. > > > > Which o

Bug#100346: PROPOSAL] Do not mandate existence of shared libraries

2001-06-10 Thread Herbert Xu
he fragile base > class problem, or the effect of certain forms of name mangeling). Well, perhaps your time would be better spent in addressing these issues. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: htt

Bug#100346: PROPOSAL] Do not mandate existence of shared libraries

2001-06-09 Thread Herbert Xu
hat you're referring to aren't .a's then this section doesn't even apply. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Re: Bug#99324: Default charset should be UTF-8

2001-06-03 Thread Herbert Xu
Radovan Garabik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arabic and hebrew have problem of being written right-to-left, > and therefore they cannot be easily supported, unicode or not. That's a display issue, not an encoding one. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) E

Re: mandate ldconfig -X?

2001-05-31 Thread Herbert Xu
nd the first action merely adds an stat if the symlink exists. If this is not how ldconfig works currently, then it should be fixed. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh

2001-05-20 Thread Herbert Xu
x27;m open to suggestions. I object most strongly. The only reason why things like POSIX exists is because in general there is no consensus. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/

Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?

2001-05-13 Thread Herbert Xu
ecause > they depend on it implicitely... Nope. It will truly be essential without actually being marked essnetial as an essential package depends on it. So this actually avoids the need for explicit dependencies. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert

Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?

2001-05-13 Thread Herbert Xu
n awk anyway. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?

2001-05-13 Thread Herbert Xu
ing all of the editors, > they'll know how to fix it by adding back some editors. This isn't > fool-proof, but so what? Agreed. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?

2001-05-12 Thread Herbert Xu
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:38:09AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: >> I'm not talking about editing config files here. I'm more interested in >> programs that invoke /usr/bin/editor. > Well, see Policy section 12.4. "Edi

Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?

2001-05-12 Thread Herbert Xu
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 09:07:30AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: >> >>From a package dependency point of view, almost essential is a world away >> from actually being essential. > Packages can assume that the user has means o

Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?

2001-05-12 Thread Herbert Xu
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 11:04:14PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: >> >> The comparison breaks down as there isn't an editor which is actually >> essential. > Yes, but _an_ editor is almost essential. Well, it's essential

Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?

2001-05-12 Thread Herbert Xu
or which is actually essential. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper

2001-04-24 Thread Herbert Xu
ld-time dependencies aren't just for buildd's. Humans need them too. I wouldn't like to have to compile a package and fail near the very end just because it hasn't declared a proper versioned build-depends on debhelper. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/

Re: Policy for stripping binaries

2001-04-22 Thread Herbert Xu
ntian. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Re: Bug#94114: mesag3-glide2: mesag3-glide2 needs MESA_GLX_FX

2001-04-16 Thread Herbert Xu
Which I don't think is the case here. > Anyways, I can fix this, but don't expect it to happen soon. This is > not the only variable that's used by Mesa. Well, then it would be a good thing if it had a configuration file. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www

Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13

2001-04-03 Thread Herbert Xu
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads

2001-03-22 Thread Herbert Xu
accomodations for you. This is what compatibility is all about. If a library changes its ABI, then it must change its soname (or at least their package name) so it doesn't break old binaries. Other things should also act accordingly. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org

Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)

2001-03-22 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:23:08PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 12:42:57PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > Any libraries which change the ABI without changing the soname is buggy, > > period. > > Agreed. However, uploading to "stable uns

Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)

2001-03-21 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 04:51:06PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 08:42:16AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > Are you saying that packages compiled against old libc6-dev packages are > > not guarranteed to work with a new libc6? Well, better tell that to all &

Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)

2001-03-21 Thread Herbert Xu
ust because the > problems don't affect a few possibilities, does not give merit to > allowing such things, it just means they don't have problems. Nothing > good comes from doing a stable/unstable upload. The problem is that the bad things which come from it are not due to the fa

Bug#90511: An alternative solution to old libraries problem

2001-03-21 Thread Herbert Xu
you need to override this check for nonfree packages since they may not have source. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)

2001-03-21 Thread Herbert Xu
d be discussing what technical merits there are in these uploads, but what technical merits exist in disallowing them as I haven't seen any of those which are valid either. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads

2001-03-21 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 03:58:44PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 07:31:18AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > And as I said in my previous message, for libraries with the soname > > (like glibc), you do want to test it against old -dev packages to ensure > &

Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)

2001-03-21 Thread Herbert Xu
compiles that they know will come out to be the same. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads

2001-03-21 Thread Herbert Xu
u do want to test it against old -dev packages to ensure binary compatibility. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads

2001-03-21 Thread Herbert Xu
o both stable and unstable for reasons such as policy disparity, library compatibility, then yes this is what should be done. But that's what we've been doing anyway. Except of course that the version number is 1.0-1potato.1 (replace potato with the name of the current stable distri

Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)

2001-03-16 Thread Herbert Xu
precedence. Not necessarily, this is what I did in telnetd: if [ -z "$(dpkg-statoverride --list /usr/lib/telnetlogin)" ]; then chown root.telnetd /usr/lib/telnetlogin chmod 4754 /usr/lib/telnetlogin fi -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: H

Bug#89674: PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage

2001-03-15 Thread Herbert Xu
and only if" part. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10

2001-03-15 Thread Herbert Xu
ng present. Is this just "postrm purge" or all invocations of postrm? If the latter, then surely some forms of prerm can't assume dependencies either? -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#89674: PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage

2001-03-15 Thread Herbert Xu
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 12:57:17AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > Herbert Xu wrote: > > When did this (postinst can only call ldconfig if $1 = configure) become > > policy? Not only is this pointless, it also means that a lot of packages are > > now in violation of this policy. I

Bug#89674: PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage

2001-03-15 Thread Herbert Xu
call `ldconfig' in When did this (postinst can only call ldconfig if $1 = configure) become policy? Not only is this pointless, it also means that a lot of packages are now in violation of this policy. I propose that the "and only if" phrase be removed from the above sentence.

Bug#88058: PROPOSAL] ftp-client virtual package

2001-03-01 Thread Herbert Xu
ll remove that provides in the next release. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#83669: dynamic creation of libx.so.n

2001-02-05 Thread Herbert Xu
k when it is no longer > required? Does ldconfig do that? ldconfig doesn't. But it isn't that hard to remove dangling symlinks in those directories, be it by ldconfig or some other utility. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI

Bug#83669: dynamic creation of libx.so.n

2001-02-05 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 01:13:44PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > > As such, I recommend that we change this bug title to: > > "dynamic creation of libx.so.n" Sorry, but this has been solved ages ago in ldconfig :) -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Em

Re: Directing Debian users to use project BTSes - should we?

2001-02-04 Thread Herbert Xu
certainly technically possible since the Debian BTS is a totally open system. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Re: Directing Debian users to use project BTSes - should we?

2001-02-04 Thread Herbert Xu
http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Re: Directing Debian users to use project BTSes - should we?

2001-02-04 Thread Herbert Xu
significantly more conventient for upstream You wouldn't have to do that if your downstream maintainer were doing his job properly and forwarding the bugs to you. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page:

Bug#83669: Shared libraries

2001-01-27 Thread Herbert Xu
er versions" of the > library. If you've got both foo 2.0 and foo 2.1 installed, ldconfig will symlink foo 2.1 it to foo.so.2 which is exactly what you want. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Pag

Bug#83669: Shared libraries

2001-01-27 Thread Herbert Xu
Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > and allow shlibs with different minor version numbers to be installed > > together by encoding it into the package name. Of course, we'll have > > to man

Bug#83669: Shared libraries

2001-01-26 Thread Herbert Xu
easy to figure out what -L flags were used during the compile and hence find the correct .so file. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#83669: Shared libraries

2001-01-26 Thread Herbert Xu
namically as well. This would require changing how dpkg-shlibdeps works though. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#77400: PROPOSAL] require packages to disable /etc/logrotate.d files on removal

2000-11-18 Thread Herbert Xu
or even better, a directive that actually queries the status of a package. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#73620: Policy example about INSTALL is wrong

2000-10-05 Thread Herbert Xu
ter in this section, the value of the variable should > be /usr/bin/install. If it is set to a non-absolute path, configure will add > dots in subdirectories to refer to the top-level command, and then calls to Well let's fix autoconf then. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://w

Re: A thought on urgency

2000-09-19 Thread Herbert Xu
ian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#69031: ITP netkit-timed & new virtual package time-daemon

2000-08-12 Thread Herbert Xu
east, they'll have to conflict for now. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Bug#55730: Updating policy

2000-07-12 Thread Herbert Xu
it. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Re: Bug#66535: proposal of virtual package: syslogd

2000-07-01 Thread Herbert Xu
Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > names: ftp-server, not ftpd, or c-compiler, not cc. I'd rather have > the virtual package be named system-log-daemon. Just a suggestion. Personally I prefer syslog-daemon. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/

Re: Parseable copyright files

2000-06-19 Thread Herbert Xu
1994 J. Lawrence Stephan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Copyright (C) 1991,1992 Ian Lance Taylor Copyright (C) 1991,1992,1994 Linus Torvalds Copyright (C) 1992,1993,1994 Andrew Tridgell Copyright (C) 1992 Theodore Ts'o Copyright (C) 1994 University of Bristol, England -- Debian GNU/Linux 2

Re: Finger daemons in Debian should use a virtual package

2000-05-22 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 09:28:35PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 01:25:06PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote: > > > > after uninstalling both fingerd and cfingerd my /etc/inetd.conf contains: > > #:INFO: Info services > > finger stream tcp

Re: Finger daemons in Debian should use a virtual package

2000-05-22 Thread Herbert Xu
stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/tcpd > /usr/sbin/cfingerd This is broken. You should never have anything commented out with ## unless the package in question is in an unconfingured state. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[

Re: Finger daemons in Debian should use a virtual package

2000-05-22 Thread Herbert Xu
h an error because of false > arguments, it just silently ignores it and continue. Wrong. the argument to --remove is the pattern. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbe

  1   2   >