Bug#193103: debian-policy: maybe say that programs that output HTML etc. should output valid HTML etc.

2003-05-13 Thread Graham Wilson
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:25:00AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 09:13:05PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote: > > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:25:52AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:20:03AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > > > &g

Bug#193103: debian-policy: maybe say that programs that output HTML etc. should output valid HTML etc.

2003-05-12 Thread Graham Wilson
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:25:52AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:20:03AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > > Package: debian-policy > > Version: 3.5.8.0 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > If there is a checklist for quality, then maybe say that programs that > > output HTML etc. s

Bug#174048: 13.3: wrong path in paragraph "Packages must not require ..."

2002-12-23 Thread Graham Wilson
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 11:43:04AM +0100, Arthur Korn wrote: > "Packages must not require the existance of any files in /usr/share/doc/ > in order to function [60]. Any files that are referenced by programs but > are also useful as standalone documentation should be installed under > /usr/share/doc

Re: [devel-ref] author/homepage in description

2002-12-08 Thread Graham Wilson
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 05:08:20PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote: > Ideally debian/control's known fields would be extended, e.g., > > Upstream-Maintainer: John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Upstream-Homepage: http://whatever.sourceforge.net/ > > Is this worthy of filing as a wishlist on dpkg? def