On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:25:52AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:20:03AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > > Package: debian-policy > > Version: 3.5.8.0 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > If there is a checklist for quality, then maybe say that programs that > > output HTML etc. should output valid HTML etc. > > > > E.g. one installs a program that makes a photo gallery of images, into > > a web page. But this page doesn't pass the HTML validator. > > Surely we don't need policy to say that a bug is a bug. It's quite clear > that invalid HTML is a bug (maintainers may not think it's a > particularly urgent bug, but it's a bug nevertheless). No need for > policy to state the obvious.
i think the author means _valid_ html, not just invalid html. of course, this statement is made on the assumption that there is a difference, though some might not agree. -- gram
pgp7UbJ5gwW6S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
