Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001205 20:37]:
> > > Fortunately, things aren't very severe right now. And, certainly,
> > > I think that if we could pull a solution together by the time that
> > > Woody freezes, tha
At 03:29 pm -0700 on December 07, 2000, John Galt wrote:
> DANGER WILL ROBINSON! If a task-* package only installs one package, it
> sounds like the package description isn't being clear enough in the
> package to be installed.
A clear description is useless to a user that doesn't have the time
At 12:46 am -0800 on December 07, 2000, Chris Waters wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 02:29:18PM -0800, Brian Frederick Kimball wrote:
> > At 10:31 pm -0800 on December 04, 2000, Chris Waters wrote:
>
> > > We *do* distribute the GPL with the binaries. It's i
At 10:31 pm -0800 on December 04, 2000, Chris Waters wrote:
> We *do* distribute the GPL with the binaries. It's in the source
> tarball.
Don't you see anything wrong with this statement?
At 04:09 pm -0500 on November 30, 2000, Brian Mays wrote:
> Brian Frederick Kimball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Think of it this way: each "downloadable entity" that meets the above
> > definition of "Program" needs to have the GPL inside it
>
ave nothing better to
do...") and claims to the effect of "I don't like the consequences of
that interpretation, so I won't accept it."
brian
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Brian Frederick Kimball writes:
> >[Brian Mays wrote]:
> >> We
At 07:09 am -0500 on November 30, 2000, Brian Mays wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> > However, Debian is in a different position, and the problem is that
> > people can and do pull .debs off the Debian site and install them on
> > other distros. The license really doe
At 12:36 pm -0500 on November 30, 2000, Brian Mays wrote:
> "Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think that "complete work" stands for every work that can be used
> > in any installed system without missing parts... just like fileutils
> > and debhelper. Debian distrib
At 09:35 pm -0800 on November 29, 2000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> [...] the GPL requires that you give a copy of the GPL to anyone you
> give the binary for a program to.
Interestingly, this appears to only apply to some GPLed binaries, not
all (see example below). And of course it is only n
At 08:17 am +1100 on November 30, 2000, Anand Kumria wrote:
> 1. "You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's
> source code as you receive it ..."
>
> Applies to *source code* only. We distribute orginial tarballs
> which include the licence text. We are okay here.
keep reading:
At 04:17 pm -0500 on November 29, 2000, Brian Mays wrote:
> The GPL says that we can distribute the binaries ...
>
> : ... provided that you conspicuously and appropriately publish on each
> : copy an appropriate copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty; keep
> : intact all the notices that
11 matches
Mail list logo
