Hello,
On Thu 26 Sep 2019 at 09:59AM +02, Ansgar wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 4.4.0.1
> Severity: normal
>
> Packages should ship systemd units as this provides a better
> experience to users. (In particular the systemd-sysv-generator has to
> make some assumptions that are not alw
Dmitry Bogatov writes:
> This lintian check have number of false-positives, like `foo@.service`
> files triggering complains about missing `/etc/init.d/foo@` scripts,
That's not a false positive according to current policy. See also
#911165.
> and sometimes names plainly do not match (e.g bin:if
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 15:26 +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> If this is the case, I'd propose wording like following:
>
> [ ... All packages with daemons must provide init.d scripts ...],
> unless software is only usable, by upstream's design, when pid1 is
> provided by some alternative init s
[2019-09-25 18:18] Ansgar
> Practically the project seems to have already
> decided that this is fine, even for packages that don't require
> systemd:
>
> +---
> | There are 1033 non-overridden instances of lintian detecting a
> | service unit without an init.d script [7].
> +---[ https://lists.
[2019-09-25 11:50] David Steele
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 11:43 AM Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> >
> >
> > [2019-09-22 16:13] David Steele
> > > Candidate language attached. It adds "Also excepted are packages which
> > > require a
> > > feature of an alternate init system which is not available in
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.4.0.1
Severity: normal
Packages should ship systemd units as this provides a better
experience to users. (In particular the systemd-sysv-generator has to
make some assumptions that are not always correct; it is better to
explicitly tell systemd what to do.)
Ansg
Control: reassign -1 debian-policy
The section on initscripts has too much implementation details about
/etc/rcn.d; these are better explained by external documentation.
Also the rationale for why `DISABLED=yes` (or similar) fits better
into a footnote than the main text (IMHO).
(Policy also shou
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 debian-policy
Bug #941194 [bugs.debian.org] initscripts: remove some implementation details
Bug reassigned from package 'bugs.debian.org' to 'debian-policy'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #941194 to the same values
previously set
Ignori
8 matches
Mail list logo