[2019-09-25 18:18] Ansgar <ans...@43-1.org> > Practically the project seems to have already > decided that this is fine, even for packages that don't require > systemd: > > +--- > | There are 1033 non-overridden instances of lintian detecting a > | service unit without an init.d script [7]. > +---[ https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/09/msg00001.html ]
I believe it partially my fault in this mis-representation. Yes, problem exists (and it is severe), but not as severe like 1033 out of 1300 daemons missing init.d scripts. This lintian check have number of false-positives, like `foo@.service` files triggering complains about missing `/etc/init.d/foo@` scripts, and sometimes names plainly do not match (e.g bin:ifupdown). -- Note, that I send and fetch email in batch, once in a few days. Please, mention in body of your reply when you add or remove recepients.
