Le Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 06:15:52PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
>
> I would have to disagree with that. The recent delegation among
> other things says "defines [...] technical requirements that all
> packages must satisfy". What the ctte here wants to do is set
> policy about having a Depends o
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:25:45PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Policy could include a word of warning about hypertext documentation.
I reported #738176 against lintian because I noticed Debian contributors
taking incorrect actions (for eg #738101) based on the lintian tag
descriptions. Bastian
Steve Langasek writes:
> I question the whole notion of DPL delegation of policy powers to the
> policy editors. The power to decide the contents of the debian-policy
> package follows from their status as package maintainers; package
> maintenance is not something that I believe it's in the pur
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 06:15:52PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 05:45:19PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:13:52PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:04:12AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > > "Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" writes:
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 05:45:19PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:13:52PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:04:12AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > "Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" writes:
> > >
> > > > Back then, the gnome maintainers added a dependency o
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:13:52PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:04:12AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > "Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" writes:
> >
> > > Back then, the gnome maintainers added a dependency on another package,
> > > which happened to be providing an /sbin/init. Thi
6 matches
Mail list logo
