Le Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 06:15:52PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > > I would have to disagree with that. The recent delegation among > other things says "defines [...] technical requirements that all > packages must satisfy". What the ctte here wants to do is set > policy about having a Depends on an init system. Under the > delegation I think this is something for the policy editors to > decide.
Hi Kurt, I hope that I am not the only one to think as follows: I would much prefer if the secretary would not engage participating to a debate after making a constitutional decision in the same debate. This lack of neutrality strongly undermines the respect that I give to your constituional decisions. Here in particular, you are actively pushing a change that 1) is the consequence of your constitutional decision and 2) is facing opposition from the people who are doing the work. I think that it is harmful: it can only result in less work done done for Debian. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140209044933.gb2...@falafel.plessy.net
