Charles Plessy wrote:
> +
> + Package-Type
> +
> +
> + Simple field containing a word indicating the type of package:
> + deb for binary packages and udeb for micro
> binary
> + packages. Other types not defined here may be indicated. In
ud
Hi all,
here is a new version trying to addres Simon's and Guillem's comments.
By the way, isn't "Package-Type: udeb" completely redundant with "Section:
debian-installer" ?
Have a nice week-end,
-- Charles
@@ -2671,6 +2671,7 @@ Package: libc6
Description
(mandatory)
H
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 21:05:21 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 03:58:31AM +0100, Guillem Jover a écrit :
> > It will only list binary packages, not all the information for the
> > source package is currently available from other fields in the .dsc
> > file, but it could be ex
Le Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 03:58:31AM +0100, Guillem Jover a écrit :
>
> On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 07:32:54 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> >
> > Multiline field listing all the packages that can be built from
> > the source package, considering every architecture.
Le vendredi 11 janvier 2013 00:19:42, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>
> On my computer, I see at least two packages that do not indicate the full
> path.
>
> ballview: icon="ballview_32x32.xpm"\
> klavaro: icon="klavaro-logo.xpm"\
>
> It looks like a good candidate for a Lintian test...
>
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
