Hi all,
here is a new version trying to addres Simon's and Guillem's comments.
By the way, isn't "Package-Type: udeb" completely redundant with "Section:
debian-installer" ?
Have a nice week-end,
-- Charles
@@ -2671,6 +2671,7 @@ Package: libc6
<item><qref id="f-Description"><tt>Description</tt></qref>
(mandatory)</item>
<item><qref id="f-Homepage"><tt>Homepage</tt></qref></item>
<item><qref id="built-using"><tt>Built-Using</tt></qref></item>
+ <item><qref id="f-Package-Type"><tt>Package-Type</tt></qref></item>
</list>
</p>
@@ -2751,6 +2752,7 @@ Package: libc6
<item><qref id="f-VCS-fields"><tt>Vcs-Browser</tt>, <tt>Vcs-Git</tt>,
et al.</qre
<item><qref
id="f-Standards-Version"><tt>Standards-Version</tt></qref> (recommend
<item><qref id="sourcebinarydeps"><tt>Build-Depends</tt> et
al</qref></item>
+ <item><qref id="f-Package-List"><tt>Package-List</tt></qref>
(recommended)</item>
<item><qref id="f-Checksums"><tt>Checksums-Sha1</tt>
and <tt>Checksums-Sha256</tt></qref> (mandatory)</item>
<item><qref id="f-Files"><tt>Files</tt></qref> (mandatory)</item>
@@ -3801,6 +3803,34 @@ Checksums-Sha256:
</taglist>
</p>
</sect1>
+
+ <sect1 id="f-Package-List">
+ <heading><tt>Package-List</tt></heading>
+
+ <p>
+ Multiline field listing all the packages that can be built from
+ the source package, considering every architecture. The first line
+ of the field value is empty. Each one of the next lines describes
+ one binary package, by listing its name, type, section and priority
+ separated by spaces. Fifth and subsequent space-separated items
+ may be present and parsers must allow them. See the
+ <qref id="f-Package-Type">Package-Type</qref> field for a list of
+ package types.
+ </p>
+ </sect1>
+
+ <sect1 id="f-Package-Type">
+ <heading><tt>Package-Type</tt></heading>
+
+ <p>
+ Simple field containing a word indicating the type of package:
+ <tt>deb</tt> for binary packages and <tt>udeb</tt> for micro binary
+ packages. Other types not defined here may be indicated. In
+ source package control files, the <tt>Package-Type</tt> field
+ should be omitted instead of giving it a value of <tt>deb</tt>, as
+ this value is assumed for paragraphs lacking this field.
+ </p>
+ </sect1>
</sect>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130112062913.ga31...@falafel.plessy.net
