Charles Plessy writes:
> I am still confused. Does the discussed paragraph mean that the whole
> NMU changelog entry has to be still present in the changelog, just under
> the latest entry, or that they have to be closed again in the latest
> entry ?
Either one will work for keeping the fixed v
Le Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 05:38:11PM -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit :
>
> Versioning is a directed acyclic graph. Each version has at most one
> ancestor, though it may have many descendants. When you upload a
> maintainer upload (MU) without including the NMU changelog entry, you
> are indicating tha
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 04:19:50PM -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> > Yes, that's still how the BTS works. Otherwise, the MU is a
> > descendant of the previous MU instead of the NMU. You can
> > alternatively just include the changelog entries from the
Le Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 04:19:50PM -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:33:31 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> > > Talking about improvements, if the following part about NMU
> > > acknowledgement is
> > > obsolete as I think, h
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:33:31 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > Talking about improvements, if the following part about NMU acknowledgement
> > is
> > obsolete as I think, how about removing it, either as a separate bug, or as
> > part of the general
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:33:31 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Talking about improvements, if the following part about NMU acknowledgement is
> obsolete as I think, how about removing it, either as a separate bug, or as
> part of the general refresh of the section that is discussed here.
>
> To ac
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #developers-reference (3.4.8) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Upgrades to stable should be discussed using reportbug. Thanks to Don
> #Armstrong for the patch.
> #Acked-by: Julien Cristau . Closes: #670362
> #
> limit source developer
Package: debian-policy
Hi,
"2.4 Sections" is missing the section 'tasks':
projectb=> select s.section, s.created from section s where s.section = 'tasks';
section |created
-+---
tasks | 2011-04-01 15:31:59.554227+00
This section is also missi
8 matches
Mail list logo
